--- title: "Centro Energy vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Centro Energy vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-trina-solar" --- # Centro Energy vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 13 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | China | | Headquarters | | Changzhou | | Founded | | 1997 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 13 | 340 | +327 | | Max Power | 670 W | 760 W | +90 W | | Avg Power | 498 W | 520 W | +22 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 21.57% | 24.80% | +3.23 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 20.80% | 21.71% | +0.91 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.404%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.102 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp | | Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.3 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 2 (15.4%) | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 5 (38.5%) | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 6 (46.2%) | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution Centro Energy offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup) | Power band | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 3 (23.1%) | 28 (8.2%) | | 500-599W | 5 (38.5%) | 54 (15.9%) | | 600-699W | 5 (38.5%) | 72 (21.2%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | Centro Energy | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 13 (100.0%) | 75 (22.1%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) | | Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, Centro Energy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [CE-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [CE-665M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-665m) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [CE-660M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-660m) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [CE-655M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-655m) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [CE-650M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-650m) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [CE-550HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-550hm) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [CE-545HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-545hm) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [CE-540HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-540hm) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [CE-535HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-535hm) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [CE-530HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-530hm) | 530 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Centro Energy is a Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturer with production facilities in China and Vietnam, reporting approximately 1 GW of annual module capacity and around 800 MW of cell capacity. The company has been active in the industry for over a decade, offering products certified to IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 standards and claiming distribution across more than 40 countries. Notably, Centro Energy does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list, which limits its appeal for project finance scenarios where lender bankability requirements apply. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, operates at an entirely different scale: the company shipped approximately 77 GW of modules in 2024, placing it among the top three global manufacturers by volume, and has consistently maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - a recognition reconfirmed in Q1 2025. With manufacturing diversified across multiple countries and total cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW, Trina Solar carries a substantially stronger institutional footprint. Centro Energy's catalog spans residential, commercial, and light industrial applications with panel outputs ranging from 100 W to 670 W. The lineup includes a TOPCon series, a Deep Black aesthetic line, and BIPV modules, making it a reasonably versatile option for small-to-mid-scale integrators seeking flexible sourcing. Trina Solar structures its offer around the Vertex platform: the Vertex N family targets utility-scale ground-mount projects with n-type TOPCon modules reaching up to 760 W and a confirmed efficiency of 24.5 percent; the Vertex S+ series serves residential rooftop and C&I segments, including a Full Black variant and a Shield module engineered for enhanced hail resistance; and a 670 W C&I-oriented module rounds out the commercial tier. Trina's TOPCon n-type technology has been independently documented across multiple industry sources. For most international buyers - whether a residential installer or a utility-scale developer - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default, backed by verifiable production scale, continuous Tier 1 bankability, and a mature, field-tested product range. Centro Energy may suit cost-sensitive buyers willing to conduct their own due diligence on warranty enforcement and local service availability, but the two brands are not interchangeable in terms of institutional standing or documented market presence. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Centro Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [Centro Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [Centro Energy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-trina-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.