---
title: "Centro Energy vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Centro Energy vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-akcome"
---

# Centro Energy vs AKCOME

Centro Energy has the broader catalog (13 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Centro Energy | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Suzhou |
| Founded |  | 2003 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Centro Energy | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 13 | 3 | +10 |
| Max Power | 670 W | 700 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 498 W | 672 W | +173 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Centro Energy | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.57% | 22.54% | +0.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.80% | 21.63% | +0.82 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Centro Energy | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.404%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.164 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.9 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +3.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | Centro Energy | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (15.4%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 5 (38.5%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 6 (46.2%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Centro Energy | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 3 (23.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 5 (38.5%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 5 (38.5%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Centro Energy | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 13 (100.0%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Centro Energy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CE-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CE-665M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-665m) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CE-660M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-660m) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CE-655M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-655m) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CE-650M](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-650m) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.400 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CE-550HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-550hm) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CE-545HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-545hm) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CE-540HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-540hm) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CE-535HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-535hm) | 535 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CE-530HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/centro-energy-ce-530hm) | 530 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd, founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010. It has appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer list in the past, though reporting indicates it was dropped from that tracking list in early 2025 after site-accessibility issues, so its current bankability status should be treated as uncertain rather than assured. The company has operated module capacity in the high single-digit gigawatt range (around 9.4 GW modules reported in 2022) and has stated ambitions to scale toward 40 GW over several years, alongside a sizeable mounting-systems business and over 1.5 GW of owned solar farms across Asia-Pacific. Centro Energy is a China- and Vietnam-based cell-to-module manufacturer and system integrator whose panels are sold in more than 40 countries and are IEC61215/IEC61730 certified, with third-party testing reportedly placing them in the upper tier of module quality benchmarks; however, no independent BNEF Tier 1 listing or precise GW-scale production figure for Centro Energy turned up in available sources, so its institutional footprint is harder to verify. On balance, AKCOME shows a longer public track record, stock-market listing, and clearer (if recently contested) Tier 1 history, giving it the stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Product-wise, AKCOME's more recent catalog centers on N-type technology, with its AK iPower line built around heterojunction (HJT) cells - a technology it began investing in as early as 2018 - and its AK iTopper line using TOPCon cells, including a 620W module aimed at small and medium-sized commercial and residential installations. Centro Energy's range spans a wide 100W to 670W power band, covering everything from small residential modules to larger commercial panels, with reported average efficiencies around 20.8% and a headline performance warranty of about 27 years, positioning it as a broad, mid-range supplier for both home rooftops and commercial projects rather than a technology leader in any single cell type.

For a typical 2025 buyer, AKCOME is arguably the more defensible choice for larger or bankability-sensitive projects given its longer corporate history, public listing, and advanced N-type (HJT/TOPCon) product lines, while Centro Energy can be a reasonable pick for standard residential or commercial rooftop jobs where broad wattage options and warranty length matter more than brand pedigree. Buyers evaluating either should independently confirm current BNEF Tier 1 status and specific product datasheets before committing, since public rankings for both brands have shifted recently.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/akcome-lands-intersolar-europe-with-n-type-panels/ \| Akcome lands Intersolar Europe with N-type panels \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| Akcome solar panel independent review \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| Akcome Solar Panels: An Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/centro-energy \| Centro Energy Co., Ltd. profile - Solar Panels, China \| article

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/363/centrosolar-america-inc/ \| Centrosolar - Profile and Reviews \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Centro Energy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Centro Energy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Centro Energy vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/centro-energy-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.