---
title: "CELLINE vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare CELLINE vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-trina-solar"
---

# CELLINE vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | CELLINE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Celline is a brand of small-wattage photovoltaic modules (10W–40W) primarily sold in Poland, targeting off-grid and low-power applications. Their panels feature monocrystalline cells on a rigid composite frame with anti-reflective glass and are distributed through Polish solar equipment retailers.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | CELLINE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | CELLINE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | CELLINE | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | CELLINE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | CELLINE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | CELLINE | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Trina Solar is a Chinese solar module manufacturer founded in 1997 in Changzhou by Gao Jifan and headquartered there, with an international base subsequently established in Shanghai. The company has maintained a consistent presence on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list and shipped over 70 GW of modules in 2024 alone, bringing cumulative global shipments beyond 292 GW by the end of Q2 2025. It ranks among the top four module suppliers worldwide by volume. CELLINE, by contrast, does not appear in any of the major industry tracking sources consulted - including pv-magazine.com, pvtech.org, BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, or ENF Solar's manufacturer directory - and no verifiable data on its country of origin, founding date, annual production capacity, or bankability certification could be found. On institutional footprint alone, Trina Solar operates in a different league.

Trina Solar's product portfolio is well-documented and spans multiple market segments. The flagship Vertex series targets utility-scale ground-mount projects with large-format modules reaching up to 760 W using TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex S and Vertex S+ lines address commercial rooftop and C&I applications, while the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra range, confirmed at 24.5 percent module efficiency, serves both residential and high-density commercial installations. The company's bifacial TOPCon modules have been validated in large-scale project financing across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. For CELLINE, no independent source confirms what cell technology the brand uses, which product families it offers, or whether its modules carry IEC or UL certification - buyers would need to obtain and independently verify datasheets and test reports directly from the supplier.

For an international buyer evaluating both brands, Trina Solar is the clear default: proven bankability, a global replacement-parts ecosystem, and extensive field data reduce project risk materially. CELLINE cannot be assessed fairly without primary documentation, so it should only be considered after rigorous supplier due diligence, and is unlikely to satisfy lender requirements on financed projects without additional certification evidence.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [CELLINE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [CELLINE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [CELLINE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-trina-solar