---
title: "CELLINE vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare CELLINE vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-q-cells"
---

# CELLINE vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | CELLINE | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website |  | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Celline is a brand of small-wattage photovoltaic modules (10W–40W) primarily sold in Poland, targeting off-grid and low-power applications. Their panels feature monocrystalline cells on a rigid composite frame with anti-reflective glass and are distributed through Polish solar equipment retailers.

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | CELLINE | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 89 | +89 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 675 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 468 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | CELLINE | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.20% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.21% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | CELLINE | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.325%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (39%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | CELLINE | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | CELLINE | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | CELLINE | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 0 | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (9.0%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

CELLINE is a solar panel brand for which no significant coverage appears in any major industry publication, manufacturer ranking, or Tier 1 / BloombergNEF bankability list as of mid-2026. Its country of origin, founding date, annual production scale, and financial backing are not documented in accessible English-language sources, which itself signals a limited institutional footprint. Q-Cells, by contrast, traces its roots to a German startup founded in 1999 and is now wholly owned by South Korea's Hanwha Group, which acquired it in 2012. Operating under the Hanwha Q CELLS brand, it holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, runs the largest solar module factory in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia, and has been moving toward roughly 8.4 GW of U.S.-based module capacity. A $1.45 billion U.S. Department of Energy loan guarantee secured in late 2024 further underlines its bankability. On institutional scale and verified market standing, Q-Cells is clearly the stronger party.

On the product side, Q-Cells is best known for its Q.PEAK DUO and Q.TRON series, which target the premium-to-mid residential and light commercial rooftop segment. The brand emphasizes competitive temperature coefficients - as low as -0.29%/°C - making its panels particularly suitable for hot-climate markets such as the U.S. Southwest and Southeast. Reviewed efficiency figures reach into the low-to-mid 22% range for mainstream lines, and the company backs panels with 25-year product warranties. CELLINE's product families, cell technology (TOPCon, HJT, or PERC), and typical use cases cannot be described with any specificity because no credible third-party source documents them.

For a typical buyer in 2025-2026, Q-Cells is the clear default choice. It carries independently verified quality credentials, domestic U.S. manufacturing that reduces trade-policy risk, strong installer support networks, and documented warranty backing from a multinational parent. CELLINE cannot be recommended on the basis of currently available public information, and buyers should request independent datasheet verification and installer references before considering any panel from a brand with no traceable Tier 1 history.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Q CELLS solar panels expert review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - cost, efficiency, performance \| review

\- https://taiyangnews.info/business/hanwha-solutions-planning-8-4-gw-us-production-capacity \| Hanwha Solutions planning 8.4 GW US production capacity \| article

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do \| Hanwha Qcells Cartersville factory set for 3.3 GW annual production \| article

\- https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/ \| Hanwha Qcells $1.45B DOE loan and record cell efficiency \| article

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

\- \[Hanwha Solutions Planning 8.4 GW US Production Capacity - TaiyangNews\](https://taiyangnews.info/business/hanwha-solutions-planning-8-4-gw-us-production-capacity)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells Cartersville Factory - 3.3 GW Annual Production\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-new-cartersville-factory-set-for-33-gw-of-solar-module-production-per-year.do)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells $1.45B DOE Loan and Record Cell Efficiency - Carbon Credits\](https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [CELLINE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [CELLINE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [CELLINE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-q-cells