---
title: "CELLINE vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare CELLINE vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# CELLINE vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | CELLINE | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website |  | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Celline is a brand of small-wattage photovoltaic modules (10W–40W) primarily sold in Poland, targeting off-grid and low-power applications. Their panels feature monocrystalline cells on a rigid composite frame with anti-reflective glass and are distributed through Polish solar equipment retailers.

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | CELLINE | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | CELLINE | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | CELLINE | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | CELLINE | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | CELLINE | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | CELLINE | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

CELLINE and Jinko Solar occupy entirely different tiers of the photovoltaic manufacturing landscape. CELLINE is a niche producer of very low-wattage modules - available products include 10 W, 20 W, and 40 W panels built from monocrystalline cells mounted on a lightweight composite substrate, distributed primarily through Polish regional channels as low-voltage components. The complete absence of any standard-wattage panel data in its profile (0 panels, 0 Wp recorded) confirms that CELLINE does not compete in the residential rooftop or commercial solar segment. Jinko Solar, by contrast, is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers: a Chinese company founded in 2006, listed on the NYSE, with a stated production capacity of 130 GW and over 33,800 employees. It holds Tier 1 bankable status with all major rating agencies and has accumulated over 300 GW of installations globally.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 panel models spans a wide range of applications, with maximum power reaching 735 Wp and average module efficiency at 22.0%, with top models achieving 24.8%. TOPCon cell technology accounts for 39.4% of its lineup, and in late 2025 Jinko set a world record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79%, underscoring its R&D leadership. An average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C per Pmax and a mean product warranty of 28.5 years make Jinko modules well-suited for residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications alike. The bifacial share of 31.9% reflects strong positioning in ground-mount and flat-roof segments. CELLINE's 10-40 W modules, built on composite substrates, are suitable only for off-grid power supply, low-voltage auxiliary systems, or decorative architectural integrations - not for any mainstream PV installation.

For international buyers evaluating the two, the comparison is not a close one. Jinko Solar provides a bankable, fully documented, globally serviced product range covering every mainstream installation type. CELLINE serves a narrow niche of very small off-grid or auxiliary power needs. Any buyer requiring panels above 40 Wp, Tier 1 bankability, or access to an established warranty and service network should select Jinko Solar by default.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [CELLINE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [CELLINE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [CELLINE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-jinko-solar