--- title: "CELLINE vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare CELLINE vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-hyundai" --- # CELLINE vs Hyundai Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 0 models). Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | CELLINE | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | South Korea | | Headquarters | | Seongnam-si | | Founded | | 2004 | | Employees | | 206 | | Annual capacity | | 1.35 GW/year | | Tier 1 | | yes | | Listed | | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 | | Website | | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) | Celline is a brand of small-wattage photovoltaic modules (10W–40W) primarily sold in Poland, targeting off-grid and low-power applications. Their panels feature monocrystalline cells on a rigid composite frame with anti-reflective glass and are distributed through Polish solar equipment retailers. HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | CELLINE | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 65 | +65 | | Max Power | 0 W | 640 W | +640 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 442 W | +442 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | CELLINE | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 23.40% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 21.49% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | CELLINE | Hyundai | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.300%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 27.4 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | CELLINE | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 0 | 7 (10.8%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) | ## Power distribution Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup) | Power band | CELLINE | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 0 | 8 (12.3%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%) | Technology | CELLINE | Hyundai | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | PERC | 0 | 25 (38.5%) | | Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) | ## Top panels, Hyundai | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary CELLINE is a solar panel brand for which no substantive industry documentation could be found in major databases, trade publications, or bankability lists as of mid-2025. Its country of origin, founding date, annual production capacity, and Tier 1 status remain unverifiable from publicly available sources. This contrasts sharply with HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, the solar division of South Korea's HD Hyundai conglomerate, which traces its solar roots back to Hyundai Heavy Industries and has been formally recognized as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable manufacturer - a designation that signals lenders and project developers treat the brand as financially credible. Hyundai clearly holds the stronger institutional footprint of the two. On the product side, HD Hyundai Energy Solutions has confirmed commercial availability of N-type TOPCon and HJT panel families covering a wide output range, with select HJT modules reaching module efficiencies above 23% and a temperature coefficient of around -0.26 degrees C per degree C. The company backs its premium lines with 30-year product and performance warranties and has announced ongoing R&D into perovskite-HJT tandem technology. CELLINE's product families, cell technology, and warranty terms cannot be assessed here because no independent reviews or manufacturer disclosures surfaced in any credible industry source. A buyer comparing the two on equal footing is not possible with available public data. For a typical buyer in 2025 - whether residential, commercial, or small utility - HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is the clear default choice of the two. It is bankable, independently reviewed, and its technology roadmap is publicly documented. CELLINE's near-complete absence from industry records makes it impossible to recommend without significant due diligence on the buyer's part, including direct requests for third-party certifications and financial references. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://news.energysage.com/hyundai-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Hyundai Solar Panels: The Complete Review - EnergySage \| review \- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells \| article \- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-showcases-cell-and-module-competitiveness-at-re-2025/ \| HD Hyundai Energy Solutions showcases competitiveness at RE+ 2025 \| article \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review - Cost, Ratings and Reviews 2026 \| review Sources: \- \[Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels) \- \[Hyundai Solar Panels: The Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://news.energysage.com/hyundai-solar-panels-complete-review/) \- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions begins mass production of N-Type TOPCon cells - PV Magazine USA\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-begins-mass-production-of-n-type-topcon-cells/) \- \[HD Hyundai Energy Solutions showcases cell and module competitiveness at RE+ 2025 - PV Magazine USA\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/press-releases/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-showcases-cell-and-module-competitiveness-at-re-2025/) \- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [CELLINE vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai) - [CELLINE vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai) - [CELLINE vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/celline-vs-hyundai