---
title: "Canadian Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Canadian Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Canadian Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 292 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | China |
| Headquarters | Kitchener | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2001 | 1997 |
| Employees | 17,113 |  |
| Annual capacity | 51 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: CSIQ |  |
| Website | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 292 | 340 | +48 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 472 W | 520 W | +48 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.40% | 24.80% | +0.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.66% | 21.71% | +1.06 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.331%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 133 (46%) | 145 (43%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 128 (43.8%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 36 (12.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 41 (14.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 50 (17.1%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 37 (12.7%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 104 (35.6%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 72 (24.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 45 (15.4%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 64 (21.9%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (2.4%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Canadian Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 195 (66.8%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 85 (29.1%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| HJT | 12 (4.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Canadian Solar was founded in 2001 by Dr. Shawn Qu in Guelph, Ontario, Canada, and has been publicly listed on Nasdaq (CSIQ) since 2006. Its manufacturing subsidiary, CSI Solar, completed a separate IPO on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2023. The company reports an annual module production capacity of approximately 61 GW and has cumulatively delivered over 133 GW of solar modules worldwide. Trina Solar was established in December 1997 by Jifan Gao in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China - where its primary R&D and manufacturing hub remains - with an international management center opened in Shanghai in 2022. In terms of annual shipments, Trina Solar ranked third globally in 2024 with approximately 77 GW shipped, while Canadian Solar ranked seventh with approximately 31 GW. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 status: Canadian Solar was included in the S&P Global Commodity Insights 2025 premier list, while Trina Solar retained its BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation in Q1 2025 and has been recognized as a PVEL Top Performer for eleven consecutive years. By shipment volume and global market share, Trina Solar currently holds the stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Canadian Solar's main product lines include the HiKu6 (PERC cell technology) and TOPHiKu6 (N-type TOPCon) series, covering residential rooftop installations, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and utility-scale ground-mount systems. The TOPHiKu6 carries a 30-year performance warranty. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series - anchored by the Vertex N line using N-type TOPCon cells with 210 mm wafers and delivering module efficiency up to 22.5% - targets the full spectrum from residential rooftops to large utility-scale projects, and the Vertex S+ model at 475 W released in 2025 is aimed at residential and light commercial applications. Both brands offer bifacial modules suited to high-yield ground-mount deployments and maintain European distribution networks serving installers across residential, C&I, and utility segments.

For international buyers choosing between the two, both represent bankable, Tier 1 options with proven track records and global after-sales support. Trina Solar's larger production scale and higher manufacturing utilization rate give it a slight edge in supply reliability for large-volume utility projects, while Canadian Solar's diversified manufacturing footprint - spanning China, Southeast Asia, and the Americas - appeals to buyers who prioritize supply-chain resilience. For most residential and mid-scale commercial buyers, the two brands are largely interchangeable, and the practical decision will typically hinge on local pricing, distributor availability, and specific warranty terms.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Canadian Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Canadian Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Canadian Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.