---
title: "Canadian Solar vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Canadian Solar vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-sharp"
---

# Canadian Solar vs Sharp

Canadian Solar has the broader catalog (292 vs 19 models). Canadian Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.40%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Canadian Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | Japan |
| Headquarters | Kitchener | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture |
| Founded | 2001 | 1912 |
| Employees | 17,113 | 40,123 |
| Annual capacity | 51 GW/year | 15.4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: CSIQ | TYO: 6753 |
| Website | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) |

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 292 | 19 | +273 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 740 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 472 W | 576 W | +104 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.40% | 23.82% | +0.58 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.66% | 22.20% | +1.54 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.331%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 133 (46%) | 10 (53%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 27.6 yrs | +0.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Canadian Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 128 (43.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 36 (12.3%) | 1 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 41 (14.0%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| 22-23% | 50 (17.1%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| 23%+ | 37 (12.7%) | 6 (31.6%) |


## Power distribution

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | Canadian Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 104 (35.6%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 72 (24.7%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 500-599W | 45 (15.4%) | 6 (31.6%) |
| 600-699W | 64 (21.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 7 (2.4%) | 7 (36.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%)


| Technology | Canadian Solar | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 195 (66.8%) | 7 (36.8%) |
| TOPCon | 85 (29.1%) | 5 (26.3%) |
| HJT | 12 (4.1%) | 7 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sharp


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Canadian Solar is headquartered in Guelph, Canada, has been listed on Nasdaq since 2006, and operates at a global manufacturing scale of roughly 50-60 GW of annual module capacity as of 2025. It appears on Tier 1 bankability lists and was named to the S&P Global Commodity Insights Premier List of Tier 1 Cleantech Companies for 2025, with an independent DNV audit rating its factory quality systems among the industry's strongest. Sharp, by contrast, is a Japanese electronics conglomerate based in Osaka that entered solar manufacturing in 1959 and was briefly the world's largest solar cell producer around 2000, but today operates at a far smaller volume than scale leaders like Canadian Solar. On institutional footprint and production scale, Canadian Solar clearly has the stronger position today.

Canadian Solar's lineup spans residential HiKu and TOPHiKu6 modules built on N-type TOPCon cells reaching roughly 22.5 to 24.8 percent efficiency, up to bifacial TOPBiHiKu6 modules aimed at utility-scale and commercial ground-mount projects. Sharp leans more toward residential and commercial rooftop applications, with a technology mix spanning HJT, PERC and TOPCon cells and a notable share of bifacial panels, delivering average efficiency around 22.2 percent and top models up to 23.8 percent, backed by a 25-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee.

For a typical international buyer, Canadian Solar is the safer default choice given its larger manufacturing scale, broader distribution and stronger recent bankability credentials for both residential and large commercial projects. Sharp remains a credible, long-established brand with a solid quality reputation, but its comparatively modest global market presence outside Japan makes it a better fit for smaller residential installations where brand heritage and warranty terms matter more than supply-chain scale.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Canadian Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp)
- [Canadian Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sharp)
- [Canadian Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sharp)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-sharp

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.