---
title: "Canadian Solar vs Kyocera - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Canadian Solar vs Kyocera solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-kyocera"
---

# Canadian Solar vs Kyocera

Canadian Solar has the broader catalog (292 vs 8 models). Canadian Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.40%. Canadian Solar leans bifacial (46% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Canadian Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | Japan |
| Headquarters | Kitchener | Kyoto |
| Founded | 2001 | 1959 |
| Employees | 17,113 | 77,136 |
| Annual capacity | 51 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NASDAQ: CSIQ | TYO: 6971 |
| Website | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) |

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.

Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Kyocera | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 292 | 8 | +284 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 410 W | +320 W |
| Avg Power | 472 W | 302 W | +170 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Kyocera | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.40% | 21.00% | +3.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.66% | 18.21% | +2.45 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Kyocera | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.331%/°C | -0.460%/°C | +0.129 |
| Bifacial Share | 133 (46%) | 0 (0%) | +46 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Canadian Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Canadian Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 128 (43.8%) | 5 (62.5%) |
| 20-21% | 36 (12.3%) | 1 (12.5%) |
| 21-22% | 41 (14.0%) | 2 (25.0%) |
| 22-23% | 50 (17.1%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 37 (12.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Canadian Solar offers more 600W+ panels (24% of lineup)


| Power band | Canadian Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 104 (35.6%) | 6 (75.0%) |
| 400-499W | 72 (24.7%) | 2 (25.0%) |
| 500-599W | 45 (15.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 64 (21.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 7 (2.4%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)


| Technology | Canadian Solar | Kyocera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 195 (66.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 85 (29.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 12 (4.1%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 8 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Kyocera


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline |
| 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline |
| 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Canadian Solar is a Canadian manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Guelph, Ontario, that has grown into one of the largest vertically integrated solar companies in the world, with annual module manufacturing capacity of roughly 51 GW and nearly 177 GW of modules shipped since inception. It holds Tier 1 status on BloombergNEF's list and appears on S&P Global's Premier Tier 1 Cleantech Companies list, reflecting strong bankability that lenders and project financiers recognize internationally. Kyocera, by contrast, is a Japanese electronics conglomerate that entered solar manufacturing in the 1970s but has been steadily retreating from the business: it exited the North American market in 2016, closed its commercial-module factory in Tianjin, China, and now operates a single production facility in Shiga Prefecture focused narrowly on residential panels, while increasingly repositioning itself as a renewable energy aggregator rather than a module manufacturer. On institutional footprint and manufacturing scale, Canadian Solar is clearly the stronger player today.

In terms of product range, Canadian Solar offers a broad N-type TOPCon lineup under its TOPHiKu6 and TOPHiKu7 series, with outputs up to around 695W, available in bifacial configurations for utility-scale and commercial and industrial (C&I) projects and monofacial versions for residential and rooftop commercial use, alongside high-efficiency HJT modules under the HiHero+ brand. Kyocera's current catalog is limited almost entirely to smaller residential panels, with no meaningful presence in utility-scale or C&I segments, and its technology is generally regarded as dated relative to current industry benchmarks.

For a typical international buyer, whether residential, commercial, or utility-scale, Canadian Solar is the safer default choice given its production scale, Tier 1 bankability, and broader warranty and service infrastructure. Kyocera would only be relevant for small, niche residential installations where its limited product line is locally available, and the two brands are not realistically interchangeable at this point given the gap in scale and market focus.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Canadian Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kyocera)
- [Canadian Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kyocera)
- [Canadian Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-kyocera)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-kyocera

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.