---
title: "Canadian Solar vs Dyness - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Canadian Solar vs Dyness solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-dyness"
---

# Canadian Solar vs Dyness

Canadian Solar has the broader catalog (292 vs 0 models). Canadian Solar leans bifacial (46% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Canadian Solar | Dyness |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | China |
| Headquarters | Kitchener | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2001 | 2017 |
| Employees | 17,113 | 200+ |
| Annual capacity | 51 GW/year | 3+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NASDAQ: CSIQ |  |
| Website | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) | [https://www.dynesspower.com](https://www.dynesspower.com) |

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.

Dyness is a global innovator in energy storage solutions, specializing in battery system integration R&D and manufacturing. They provide lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Dyness serves over 500,000 users in 100+ countries, partnering with 90+...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Dyness | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 292 | 0 | +292 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 0 W | +730 W |
| Avg Power | 472 W | 0 W | +472 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Dyness | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.40% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.66% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Canadian Solar | Dyness | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.331%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 133 (46%) | 0 (0%) | +46 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.2 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Canadian Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Canadian Solar | Dyness |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 128 (43.8%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 36 (12.3%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 41 (14.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 50 (17.1%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 37 (12.7%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Canadian Solar offers more 600W+ panels (24% of lineup)


| Power band | Canadian Solar | Dyness |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 104 (35.6%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 72 (24.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 45 (15.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 64 (21.9%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 7 (2.4%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)


| Technology | Canadian Solar | Dyness |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 195 (66.8%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 85 (29.1%) | 0 |
| HJT | 12 (4.1%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Canadian Solar was founded in 2001 and is incorporated in Canada, with large-scale manufacturing operations in China. It has been listed on the NASDAQ since 2006 and consistently appears on Tier 1 bankability lists, including the S&P Global Commodity Insights Premier List of Tier 1 Cleantech Companies for 2025. As of mid-2025, the company reports a nameplate module manufacturing capacity of approximately 59 GW annually and shipped 6.9 GW of modules in the first quarter of 2025 alone, placing it firmly among the top-tier global panel suppliers. Dyness, by contrast, is a battery energy storage manufacturer - not a solar panel producer - founded in 2017 and headquartered in Suzhou, China, with a combined annual shipment capacity of roughly 3 GWh across its two main production bases. On institutional footprint and industry longevity, Canadian Solar is clearly the larger and more established entity.

Canadian Solar's current residential and commercial panel portfolio is built around the HiKu6 line (using mono PERC cells) and the premium TOPHiKu6 line (N-type TOPCon), with bifacial variants under the BiHiKu label suited to utility-scale ground mounts. SolarReviews ranked it the top residential panel brand for 2025, citing value-for-money alongside strong warranties. Dyness occupies an entirely different niche: its PowerBox series targets residential wall-mount storage paired with third-party hybrid inverters, while its modular Stack and PowerCube systems address commercial and industrial applications. All Dyness products use lithium iron phosphate chemistry and carry a 10-year warranty. Dyness won the EUPD Top Brand Storage award in 2025 and is generally positioned as a value-to-mid-range storage option.

A direct comparison of these two brands as competitors is not straightforward because they serve different roles in a solar energy system - Canadian Solar makes the generation hardware, while Dyness makes the storage hardware. A buyer choosing solar panels should evaluate Canadian Solar on its own merits against other panel brands. A buyer choosing a home battery should compare Dyness against storage-focused competitors. For projects requiring both panels and storage, the two brands are complementary rather than interchangeable.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/canadian-solar-panels-expert-review \| Canadian Solar Panels 2025 Expert Review - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/canadian-solar-makes-sp-global-commodity-insights-premier-list-of-tier-1-cleantech-companies-2025-302553562.html \| Canadian Solar makes S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech list 2025 \| article

\- https://investors.canadiansolar.com/news-releases/news-release-details/canadian-solar-reports-third-quarter-2025-results \| Canadian Solar Q3 2025 results - capacity and shipment figures \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/battery-storage/reviews/dyness-review.html \| Dyness Solar Battery Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/batteries/dyness-battery-review/ \| Dyness Battery - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

Sources:

\- \[Canadian Solar Panels 2025 Expert Review\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/canadian-solar-panels-expert-review)

\- \[Canadian Solar makes S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech list 2025\](https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/canadian-solar-makes-sp-global-commodity-insights-premier-list-of-tier-1-cleantech-companies-2025-302553562.html)

\- \[Canadian Solar Q3 2025 results\](https://investors.canadiansolar.com/news-releases/news-release-details/canadian-solar-reports-third-quarter-2025-results)

\- \[Dyness Solar Battery Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/battery-storage/reviews/dyness-review.html)

\- \[Dyness Battery - Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/batteries/dyness-battery-review/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Canadian Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Dyness](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-dyness)
- [Canadian Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Dyness](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-dyness)
- [Canadian Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Dyness](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-dyness)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-dyness

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.