--- title: "BYD vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare BYD vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-trina-solar" --- # BYD vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 115 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. BYD leans bifacial (95% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | BYD | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Shenzhen | Changzhou | | Founded | 1995 | 1997 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | SZSE: 002594 | | | Website | [https://www.byd.com](https://www.byd.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | BYD | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 115 | 340 | +225 | | Max Power | 735 W | 760 W | +25 W | | Avg Power | 565 W | 520 W | +45 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | BYD | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.66% | 24.80% | +1.14 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.84% | 21.71% | +0.13 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | BYD | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 | | Bifacial Share | 109 (95%) | 145 (43%) | +52 pp | | Avg Warranty | 28.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.3 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | BYD | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 5 (4.3%) | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 12 (10.4%) | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 28 (24.3%) | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 53 (46.1%) | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 17 (14.8%) | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution BYD offers more 600W+ panels (41% of lineup) | Power band | BYD | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 4 (3.5%) | 28 (8.2%) | | 400-499W | 33 (28.7%) | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 31 (27.0%) | 54 (15.9%) | | 600-699W | 34 (29.6%) | 72 (21.2%) | | 700W+ | 13 (11.3%) | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (63%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | BYD | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 72 (62.6%) | 248 (72.9%) | | PERC | 30 (26.1%) | 75 (22.1%) | | HJT | 13 (11.3%) | 0 | | Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, BYD | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HSBK-33-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HSBK-33-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HSBK-33-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [NSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [NSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [NSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [NSBK-33-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary BYD is a Chinese conglomerate headquartered in Shenzhen, founded in 1994 as a battery manufacturer before entering the solar industry in 2009. Trina Solar was established in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, and has been a dedicated photovoltaic manufacturer since its inception. Trina Solar holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status as of Q2 2025 - its eighth consecutive year achieving a 100% rating from all BNEF respondents - and has shipped more than 292 GW of modules globally. BYD appears on some industry Tier 1 listings, but its bankability standing is less consistently documented than Trina's, partly because solar is one division among many in a group whose primary identity is built around electric vehicles and energy storage. On institutional credibility and the sheer scale of solar-specific shipments, Trina Solar holds a clearly stronger footprint. BYD's module range covers residential rooftops through utility-scale ground mounts, with power outputs spanning roughly 380 W to 730 W and cell technology options that include N-type TOPCon, HJT, and bifacial configurations. The brand is generally positioned as a value-oriented alternative, priced approximately 10-15% below premium-tier competitors, though its standard product warranty terms have drawn criticism for falling short of the 25-year benchmark offered by leading Chinese peers. Trina Solar structures its portfolio around two principal families: the Vertex S+ aimed at residential and smaller commercial rooftops, and the Vertex N for C&I and utility-scale applications. Both lines are built on N-type TOPCon cells, with the flagship Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra modules reaching up to 760 W output and 24.5% efficiency, as reported by pv-magazine in December 2024. Trina Solar has earned TOP Performer recognition from Kiwa PVEL for eleven consecutive years, reinforcing its long-term reliability credentials. For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer, a C&I developer, or a utility-scale project sponsor - Trina Solar is the stronger default choice, backed by a decade-plus of bankability data, a broad certified product lineup, and warranty terms that satisfy most lender requirements. BYD remains a credible option for cost-sensitive projects in markets where its distribution network is well established, such as Brazil, or where budget constraints outweigh the need for institutional grade documentation. In financed utility or commercial projects where lender due diligence is rigorous, Trina's BNEF track record gives it a meaningful edge. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [BYD vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [BYD vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [BYD vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-trina-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.