---
title: "BYD vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare BYD vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# BYD vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 115 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. BYD leans bifacial (95% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | BYD | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1995 | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002594 | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.byd.com](https://www.byd.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | BYD | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 115 | 637 | +522 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 735 W |  |
| Avg Power | 565 W | 523 W | +42 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | BYD | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.66% | 24.80% | +1.14 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.84% | 22.18% | +0.33 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | BYD | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 109 (95%) | 231 (36%) | +59 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.5 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +0.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | BYD | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (4.3%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 12 (10.4%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 28 (24.3%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 53 (46.1%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 17 (14.8%) | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

BYD offers more 600W+ panels (41% of lineup)


| Power band | BYD | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 4 (3.5%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 33 (28.7%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 31 (27.0%) | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 34 (29.6%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 13 (11.3%) | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (63%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | BYD | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 72 (62.6%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| PERC | 30 (26.1%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| HJT | 13 (11.3%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, BYD


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HSBK-33-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HSBK-33-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HSBK-33-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NSBK-33-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

BYD, founded in 1995 in China and globally recognized as a leader in batteries and electric vehicles, operates a solar module division as part of its broader clean energy strategy, with shares listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Its solar portfolio spans 115 panel models, reaching a maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 23.66%. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has grown into one of the world's largest dedicated solar module manufacturers, with a stated production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,000 employees, and more than 300 GW of modules installed globally. Jinko's catalog covers 545 models, with its flagship Tiger Neo series achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8%. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status, qualifying them for project finance from major lending institutions, and both lead their portfolios with TOPCon cell technology - though BYD allocates a higher share of its lineup to TOPCon at 62.6%, compared to 39.4% for Jinko Solar.

BYD's most distinctive portfolio characteristic is its near-universal bifacial offering: 94.78% of its modules are bifacial, making it a strong fit for residential rooftop installs on light-colored surfaces and ground-mount systems where rear-side irradiance gains are feasible. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.299%/°C is marginally better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, an advantage during peak summer generation periods. BYD's average module power of approximately 565 Wp reflects a focused, high-wattage lineup. Jinko Solar's 545-model portfolio provides broad commercial flexibility, with its Tiger Neo series best suited for space-constrained commercial and industrial rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount projects where output density is critical. Jinko's 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer and its NYSE listing add layers of reliability assurance and financial transparency that resonate with large-scale project developers and lenders.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the stronger option for utility-scale and commercial C&I projects requiring maximum efficiency, a wide product range, and a globally audited financial track record. BYD presents a compelling case for bifacial-focused residential and small commercial projects, particularly where its parent company's vertical integration in cell and battery manufacturing provides supply chain continuity - and where the slightly superior temperature coefficient can translate into meaningful seasonal yield advantages.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [BYD vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [BYD vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [BYD vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.