---
title: "BYD vs Canadian Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare BYD vs Canadian Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-canadian-solar"
---

# BYD vs Canadian Solar

Canadian Solar has the broader catalog (292 vs 115 models). Canadian Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.40%. BYD leans bifacial (95% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | BYD | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Canada |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Kitchener |
| Founded | 1995 | 2001 |
| Employees |  | 17,113 |
| Annual capacity |  | 51 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 002594 | NASDAQ: CSIQ |
| Website | [https://www.byd.com](https://www.byd.com) | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) |

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | BYD | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 115 | 292 | +177 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 730 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 565 W | 472 W | +93 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | BYD | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.66% | 24.40% | +0.74 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.84% | 20.66% | +1.19 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | BYD | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.299%/°C | -0.331%/°C | +0.032 |
| Bifacial Share | 109 (95%) | 133 (46%) | +49 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

BYD skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | BYD | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (4.3%) | 128 (43.8%) |
| 20-21% | 12 (10.4%) | 36 (12.3%) |
| 21-22% | 28 (24.3%) | 41 (14.0%) |
| 22-23% | 53 (46.1%) | 50 (17.1%) |
| 23%+ | 17 (14.8%) | 37 (12.7%) |


## Power distribution

BYD offers more 600W+ panels (41% of lineup)


| Power band | BYD | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 4 (3.5%) | 104 (35.6%) |
| 400-499W | 33 (28.7%) | 72 (24.7%) |
| 500-599W | 31 (27.0%) | 45 (15.4%) |
| 600-699W | 34 (29.6%) | 64 (21.9%) |
| 700W+ | 13 (11.3%) | 7 (2.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (63%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)


| Technology | BYD | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 72 (62.6%) | 85 (29.1%) |
| PERC | 30 (26.1%) | 195 (66.8%) |
| HJT | 13 (11.3%) | 12 (4.1%) |


## Top panels, BYD


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HSBK-33-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HSBK-33-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HSBK-33-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [NSBK-33-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HSBK-33-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HSBK-33-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-hsbk-33-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NSBK-33-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/byd-nsbk-33-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.278 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

BYD is a Chinese conglomerate headquartered in Shenzhen, founded in 1995 originally as a battery manufacturer and best known globally today for electric vehicles, with solar panels representing one segment of its broader industrial operations. Canadian Solar was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, and has been listed on Nasdaq since 2006, giving it a longer and more transparent track record as a dedicated, standalone PV module manufacturer. Canadian Solar appears on S&P Global's Tier 1 Cleantech Companies list and reports production capacity of roughly 61 GW per year, while BYD's exact annual PV-specific manufacturing scale is less publicly transparent, though the company has confirmed gigawatt-scale shipments in select markets such as Brazil. In terms of institutional footprint and history as a specialized PV supplier, Canadian Solar holds the stronger position.

Both brands offer monocrystalline modules spanning residential rooftops to utility-scale plants. Canadian Solar runs the HiKu and TOPHiKu product families built on N-type TOPCon cells, including its newest TOPCon 3.0 generation reaching up to 670 Wp and 24.8 percent efficiency for utility and C&I projects, alongside older, lower-cost PERC modules aimed at residential use. BYD offers bifacial, HJT and TOPCon panels in the 380-730 Wp range and was an early adopter of double-glass module construction, which improves durability and long-term degradation performance, though its standard product warranty (around 12 years) trails the 25-year terms common among most Tier 1 peers, a gap worth weighing for long-horizon investments.

For a typical international buyer prioritizing warranty length and an established, financially transparent supplier, Canadian Solar is the safer default, particularly for C&I and utility-scale projects. BYD can be a compelling choice on price or specific cell technology, but buyers should verify local warranty terms and service support before committing.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [BYD vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-canadian-solar)
- [BYD vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-canadian-solar)
- [BYD vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-canadian-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/byd-vs-canadian-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.