---
title: "Bruk-Bet vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Bruk-Bet vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-q-cells"
---

# Bruk-Bet vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 20 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Nieciecza | Seoul |
| Founded | 1984 | 1999 |
| Employees | 1000+ | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl](http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 20 | 89 | +69 |
| Max Power | 480 W | 675 W | +195 W |
| Avg Power | 416 W | 468 W | +52 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.17% | 23.20% | +1.03 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.80% | 21.21% | +0.41 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.324%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.000 |
| Bifacial Share | 4 (20%) | 35 (39%) | +19 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (10.0%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (55.0%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 5 (25.0%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 2 (10.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 7 (35.0%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 13 (65.0%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Bruk-Bet | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 15 (75.0%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 3 (15.0%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| TOPCon | 2 (10.0%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Bruk-Bet


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PEM.GB-480 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480-n-type) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PEM.GB-480](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PEM.GB-470 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470-n-type) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PEM.GB-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PEM.WB-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-465) | 465 | 21.3 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PEM.WB-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PEM.WS-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PEM.WS-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-455) | 455 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PEM.BB-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-bb-450) | 450 | 20.6 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PEM.WB-410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-410) | 410 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Bruk-Bet is a Polish manufacturer headquartered in Tarnow, operating under the broader Bruk-Bet SA construction group, which has been active for more than three decades. The company launched its photovoltaic division in 2011 under the name Georyt Solar and has since built a dedicated module plant in Tarnow. As of the most recent publicly confirmed figure, annual production capacity reached 120 MW after a significant expansion - though no current data suggests the company has scaled meaningfully beyond that level. Bruk-Bet does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists and is best understood as a regional European manufacturer with a domestic-market focus. Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS under South Korea's Hanwha Group, has far broader institutional reach: it holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, and its global module production capacity exceeds 11 GW per year, with a major U.S. manufacturing hub in Georgia adding several additional gigawatts of domestic output. In terms of bankability and global footprint, Q-Cells stands considerably above Bruk-Bet.

On the product side, Bruk-Bet focuses on crystalline silicon modules using PERC cell technology with half-cut configurations and glass-glass construction, targeting residential rooftops and smaller commercial installations in Poland and Central Europe. Q-Cells serves a much wider range of use cases - from premium residential installations to utility-scale ground-mount projects - and its flagship Q.ANTUM NEO platform, which incorporates TOPCon cell architecture, reaches efficiencies above 22 percent. Its temperature coefficients are notably competitive, making the panels well suited to warm climates. Warranty terms at Q-Cells extend to 25 years on product and performance, with low annual degradation rates confirmed by independent reviewers.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is the stronger default choice given its Tier 1 bankability, superior technology generation, global service network, and long warranty track record. Bruk-Bet remains a credible option for buyers who specifically require EU-origin manufacturing or who are sourcing for smaller Polish residential projects where local distribution and support matter.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/06/06/polish-module-maker-bruk-bet-solar-raises-annual-capacity-to-120-mw/ \| Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW - pv magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/bruk-bet-solar/ \| Bruk-Bet Solar Company Overview - Production Capacity and Tier 1 status \| article

\- https://renewablesnow.com/news/polands-bruk-bet-quadruples-pv-production-capacity-to-120-mw-571360/ \| Poland's Bruk-Bet quadruples PV production capacity to 120 MW \| article

Sources:

\- \[Polish module maker Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/06/06/polish-module-maker-bruk-bet-solar-raises-annual-capacity-to-120-mw/)

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

\- \[Bruk-Bet Solar Company Overview - SolarFeeds\](https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/bruk-bet-solar/)

\- \[Poland's Bruk-Bet quadruples PV production capacity to 120 MW - RenewablesNow\](https://renewablesnow.com/news/polands-bruk-bet-quadruples-pv-production-capacity-to-120-mw-571360/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Bruk-Bet vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.