---
title: "Bruk-Bet vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Bruk-Bet vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Bruk-Bet vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 20 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | China |
| Headquarters | Nieciecza | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1984 | 2006 |
| Employees | 1000+ | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl](http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 20 | 637 | +617 |
| Max Power | 480 W | 735 W | +255 W |
| Avg Power | 416 W | 523 W | +106 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.17% | 24.80% | +2.63 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.80% | 22.18% | +1.38 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.324%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.020 |
| Bifacial Share | 4 (20%) | 231 (36%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (10.0%) | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (55.0%) | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 5 (25.0%) | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 2 (10.0%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 7 (35.0%) | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 13 (65.0%) | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Bruk-Bet | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 15 (75.0%) | 158 (24.8%) |
| N-type | 3 (15.0%) | 195 (30.6%) |
| TOPCon | 2 (10.0%) | 258 (40.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Bruk-Bet


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PEM.GB-480 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480-n-type) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PEM.GB-480](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PEM.GB-470 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470-n-type) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PEM.GB-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PEM.WB-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-465) | 465 | 21.3 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PEM.WB-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PEM.WS-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PEM.WS-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-455) | 455 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PEM.BB-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-bb-450) | 450 | 20.6 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PEM.WB-410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-410) | 410 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Bruk-Bet and Jinko Solar represent two fundamentally different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Bruk-Bet is a Polish family-owned company with roots in the construction industry dating back to 1984, which launched its photovoltaic module production in 2011 under the Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika brand. With over 1,000 employees, it operates primarily within Poland and Central Europe, offering a focused portfolio of 20 modules aimed mainly at the domestic prosumer and small commercial market. Jinko Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2006 in China, is publicly listed on the NYSE, and employs over 33,800 people with an annual production capacity of 130 GW. It holds Tier 1 bankable status - making it fully eligible for project finance from major lending institutions - and has shipped over 300 GW of modules globally, with 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer.

On the technology side, Bruk-Bet's portfolio is led by PERC cells (60% of its range), with a maximum panel power of 480 Wp and peak efficiency of 22.17%. Its average temperature coefficient of Pmax sits at -0.324%/°C, and 20% of its range is bifacial, with an average product warranty of 26.5 years. Modules carry KIWA certifications covering PID, LID, hail, and load resistance - a meaningful quality signal for buyers prioritizing verified durability. These characteristics make Bruk-Bet a credible choice for residential rooftop installations, particularly for homeowners and small installers in Poland who value local warranty enforcement and Polish-language technical support. Jinko Solar leads with N-type TOPCon technology (nearly 40% of its 545-module portfolio), achieving a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and peak power of 735 Wp. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C and a bifacial share of nearly 32% make it particularly well-suited for commercial and industrial (C&I) projects and utility-scale ground-mount solar farms, where energy yield per square meter, long-term performance guarantees averaging 28.5 years, and institutional bankability are critical requirements.

For international buyers or project developers choosing between the two, the decision largely comes down to project scale and risk profile. Bruk-Bet is a quality-certified, locally accountable supplier best matched to smaller residential or prosumer projects in Poland and Central Europe, where proximity to the manufacturer carries tangible service value. Jinko Solar, with its broader technology roadmap, Tier 1 status, massive global distribution network, and access to cutting-edge TOPCon module performance up to 735 Wp, remains the natural default for large-scale projects requiring institutional financing, high-volume delivery timelines, and the backing of a globally recognized brand.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Bruk-Bet vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.