---
title: "Bruk-Bet vs Canadian Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Bruk-Bet vs Canadian Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-canadian-solar"
---

# Bruk-Bet vs Canadian Solar

Canadian Solar has the broader catalog (292 vs 20 models). Canadian Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.40%. Canadian Solar leans bifacial (46% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland | Canada |
| Headquarters | Nieciecza | Kitchener |
| Founded | 1984 | 2001 |
| Employees | 1000+ | 17,113 |
| Annual capacity |  | 51 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: CSIQ |
| Website | [http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl](http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl) | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) |

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 20 | 292 | +272 |
| Max Power | 480 W | 730 W | +250 W |
| Avg Power | 416 W | 472 W | +56 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.17% | 24.40% | +2.23 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.80% | 20.66% | +0.14 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.324%/°C | -0.331%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 4 (20%) | 133 (46%) | +26 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Canadian Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (10.0%) | 128 (43.8%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (55.0%) | 36 (12.3%) |
| 21-22% | 5 (25.0%) | 41 (14.0%) |
| 22-23% | 2 (10.0%) | 50 (17.1%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 37 (12.7%) |


## Power distribution

Canadian Solar offers more 600W+ panels (24% of lineup)


| Power band | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 7 (35.0%) | 104 (35.6%) |
| 400-499W | 13 (65.0%) | 72 (24.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 45 (15.4%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 64 (21.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 7 (2.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)


| Technology | Bruk-Bet | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 15 (75.0%) | 195 (66.8%) |
| N-type | 3 (15.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 2 (10.0%) | 85 (29.1%) |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (4.1%) |


## Top panels, Bruk-Bet


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PEM.GB-480 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480-n-type) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PEM.GB-480](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PEM.GB-470 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470-n-type) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PEM.GB-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PEM.WB-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-465) | 465 | 21.3 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PEM.WB-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PEM.WS-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PEM.WS-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-455) | 455 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PEM.BB-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-bb-450) | 450 | 20.6 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PEM.WB-410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-410) | 410 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a Polish panel manufacturer operating under the wider Bruk-Bet Group, which has been active in construction since 1984 and entered photovoltaics in 2011. It does not appear on the publicly accessible BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, but it is one of the more recognized domestic brands in Poland, holding an estimated 6 percent share of the local market, with production scaled primarily for the domestic and regional market rather than global export. Canadian Solar, nominally headquartered in Canada with major manufacturing operations in China, has been active since 2001, consistently holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, and reports annual module manufacturing capacity in the range of roughly 51 to 61 GW, giving it a substantially stronger institutional and financial footprint than Bruk-Bet.

Bruk-Bet's lineup spans about twenty module models rated from 340 W to 480 W, with average efficiency around 20.8 percent and half-cut cell technology, aimed mainly at residential rooftop and smaller commercial projects within Poland, typically backed by around a 26-year warranty. Canadian Solar's portfolio is considerably broader, including TOPCon monocrystalline modules under the TOPHiKu and TOPBiHiKu series rated up to 690 W with cell efficiencies reaching 26.5 percent, suited to both residential rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount farms, alongside premium HJT modules under the HiHero line originally targeted at residential rooftops and increasingly offered for utility-scale use as well.

For a typical residential buyer in Poland, both brands can deliver solid technical performance, but Canadian Solar's larger manufacturing scale, established Tier 1 bankability, and newer cell technologies make it the safer default for larger or bank-financed projects. Bruk-Bet remains an appealing local option valued for its technical support and shorter regional supply chain, with broadly comparable performance for a typical rooftop installation.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Bruk-Bet vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-canadian-solar)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-canadian-solar)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-canadian-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-canadian-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.