---
title: "Bruk-Bet vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Bruk-Bet vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-aeet"
---

# Bruk-Bet vs AEET

Bruk-Bet has the broader catalog (20 vs 5 models). Bruk-Bet leads on peak efficiency at 22.17%. Bruk-Bet leans bifacial (20% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Bruk-Bet | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Poland |  |
| Headquarters | Nieciecza |  |
| Founded | 1984 |  |
| Employees | 1000+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl](http://www.solar.bruk-bet.pl) |  |

Bruk-Bet Fotowoltaika is a leading Polish manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) and BIPV modules, and part of the larger Bruk-Bet Group. The company has been operating in the construction industry since 1984 and has been active in renewable energy since 2011. Bruk-Bet is known for its high-quality building solutions and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 20 | 5 | +15 |
| Max Power | 480 W | 200 W | +280 W |
| Avg Power | 416 W | 190 W | +226 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.17% | 15.70% | +6.47 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.80% | 14.90% | +5.90 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Bruk-Bet | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.324%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 4 (20%) | 0 (0%) | +20 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +1.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | Bruk-Bet | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (10.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 11 (55.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 5 (25.0%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 2 (10.0%) | 0 |


## Power distribution


| Power band | Bruk-Bet | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 7 (35.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 13 (65.0%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Bruk-Bet | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 15 (75.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| N-type | 3 (15.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 2 (10.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Bruk-Bet


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [PEM.GB-480 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480-n-type) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [PEM.GB-480](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-480) | 480 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [PEM.GB-470 N-Type](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470-n-type) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [PEM.GB-470](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-gb-470) | 470 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [PEM.WB-465](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-465) | 465 | 21.3 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [PEM.WB-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [PEM.WS-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-460) | 460 | 21.1 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [PEM.WS-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-ws-455) | 455 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [PEM.BB-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-bb-450) | 450 | 20.6 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [PEM.WB-410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bruk-bet-pem-wb-410) | 410 | 20.8 | -0.324 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Bruk-Bet is a Polish photovoltaic manufacturer headquartered in Tarnow, active since 2011, that has grown from a modest 30 MW annual production line to roughly 120 MW after investing in equipment acquired from Meyer Burger. Its portfolio includes standard and glass-glass modules, with newer lines incorporating TOPCon cells alongside older PERC technology, and reported efficiencies up to about 22.2 percent. AEET Energy Group is a German company based in Bad Gandersheim that positions itself primarily as a full-service photovoltaic wholesaler and installer rather than a large-scale cell producer, offering polycrystalline, monocrystalline and some thin-film modules alongside solar thermal, wind and geothermal products. Neither brand appears on published BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists in available sources, and both operate at a regional rather than global manufacturing scale; of the two, Bruk-Bet has clearer documentation of its own factory capacity and cell technology roadmap, giving it a somewhat stronger and more transparent industrial footprint.

In terms of product focus, Bruk-Bet modules in the 340W to 480W range target residential and small commercial rooftops in the Central European market, with its glass-glass and TOPCon lines aimed at buyers wanting a locally manufactured, EU-based alternative to Asian imports. AEET functions more as a distributor and systems integrator, bundling modules from various production lines (including its own and third-party brands such as Sovello and Aleo Solar) with balance-of-system components for German and wider European installers, making it more of a one-stop wholesale supplier than a dedicated cell technology innovator.

For a typical 2025 buyer prioritizing a single, traceable manufacturer with documented production capacity and a defined technology upgrade path, Bruk-Bet is generally the more straightforward choice. AEET may suit buyers who value a broad, flexible product catalog and wholesale-style sourcing over a single branded manufacturing pedigree, but the available evidence does not support treating either as a globally dominant, high-volume Tier 1 producer; both are best understood as regional European players serving distinct niches rather than direct head-to-head competitors.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/06/06/polish-module-maker-bruk-bet-solar-raises-annual-capacity-to-120-mw/ \| Polish module maker Bruk-Bet Solar raises annual capacity to 120 MW \| article

\- https://renewablesnow.com/news/polands-bruk-bet-quadruples-pv-production-capacity-to-120-mw-571360/ \| Poland's Bruk-Bet quadruples PV production capacity to 120 MW \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/bruk-bet \| Bruk-Bet Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company and product listing \| article

\- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/index.php \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - photovoltaic wholesale partner overview \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Bruk-Bet vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [Bruk-Bet vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [Bruk-Bet vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/bruk-bet-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.