---
title: "Bluetti vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Bluetti vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/bluetti-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Bluetti vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 0 models). Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Bluetti | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2009 | 2006 |
| Employees | 1000-5000 | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website | [https://www.bluettipower.com](https://www.bluettipower.com) | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

Bluetti is a brand of Shenzhen Poweroak Newener Co. (formerly MAXOAK), specializing in portable power stations, solar generators, and home energy storage systems. The company offers a wide range of battery-based backup power products for residential, off-grid, and outdoor use, and operates subsidiaries in the US, UK...

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Bluetti | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 637 | +637 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 523 W | +523 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Bluetti | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.18% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Bluetti | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.304%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 231 (36%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.7 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Bluetti | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 184 (28.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)


| Power band | Bluetti | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (2.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Bluetti | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Bluetti and Jinko Solar are both China-headquartered companies, but they operate in fundamentally different segments of the solar energy market, making a direct head-to-head comparison inherently asymmetric. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006, is one of the world's largest conventional PV module manufacturers, listed on the NYSE, employing over 33,800 people, and operating with a production capacity of 130 GW per year. It holds Tier 1 bankable status - a critical credential recognized by independent financial institutions that is required for project financing on commercial and utility-scale installations. Bluetti, founded in 2009 with 1,000-5,000 employees, is a brand focused on portable power stations and foldable solar panels designed for mobile and emergency energy needs - it does not manufacture rooftop or ground-mount PV modules, as confirmed by its panel count of zero in the dataset. These two companies are not competitors in any conventional solar PV installation context.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 modules includes its flagship Tiger Neo series built on N-type TOPCon cell technology, reaching up to 24.8% efficiency and a peak output of 735 Wp, with an average module power of approximately 511 Wp across the range. The average product warranty extends to roughly 28.5 years, and the temperature coefficient of around -0.308%/°C is competitive for high-temperature climates. Jinko panels are well-suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large-scale utility ground-mount farms. Bluetti's solar offering, by contrast, consists of lightweight foldable panels up to 350-420 W designed exclusively to pair with its own portable battery stations - appropriate for camping, off-grid cabins, or emergency backup scenarios, not permanent grid-tied or off-grid home systems.

For any buyer - whether a homeowner, installer, or project developer - selecting modules for a fixed solar installation, Jinko Solar is the only relevant option between the two. Its Tier 1 bankability, 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer, global distribution network, and broad technology portfolio make it a credible choice from small residential installs to multi-megawatt projects. Bluetti serves a completely separate market and should be evaluated only when portability and compatibility with its own power station ecosystem are the primary requirements.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Bluetti vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/bluetti-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Bluetti vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/bluetti-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Bluetti vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/bluetti-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/bluetti-vs-jinko-solar