---
title: "Bisol vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Bisol vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/bisol-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Bisol vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 12 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Bisol | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Slovenia | China |
| Headquarters | Prebold | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2004 | 1997 |
| Employees | 200-500 |  |
| Annual capacity | \<1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.bisol.com](https://www.bisol.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

BISOL Group is a European manufacturer of high-quality photovoltaic modules headquartered in Prebold, Slovenia. Founded in 2004, it is considered Europe's leading authentic solar module producer with a production capacity of 750 MW and products distributed in over 120 countries. The company operates debt-free and has...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Bisol | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 12 | 340 | +328 |
| Max Power | 580 W | 760 W | +180 W |
| Avg Power | 475 W | 520 W | +45 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Bisol | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.75% | 21.71% | +0.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Bisol | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 1 (8%) | 145 (43%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Bisol skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Bisol | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 2 (16.7%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 1 (8.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 22-23% | 5 (41.7%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (33.3%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Bisol | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (16.7%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 4 (33.3%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 6 (50.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (58%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Bisol | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 7 (58.3%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 5 (41.7%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Bisol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [BGO 580](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bgo-580) | 580 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [BGO 570](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bgo-570) | 570 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [BGO 560](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bgo-560) | 560 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [BBO 520](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bbo-520) | 520 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [BBO 510](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bbo-510) | 510 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [BBO 500](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bbo-500) | 500 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [BDO 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bdo-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [BDO 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bdo-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [BDO 440](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bdo-440) | 440 | 22.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [BDO 410](https://comparepv.com/panel/bisol-bdo-410) | 410 | 20.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Bisol is a Slovenian photovoltaic module manufacturer founded in 2004 and headquartered in Prebold, making it one of the few genuinely European producers in an industry otherwise dominated by Asian supply chains. The company operates at a production capacity of around 750 MW per year, with a new manufacturing plant planned for 2027 that is expected to triple that figure. Bisol does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list - a fact the company itself has addressed in a published position statement, arguing that the list reflects project financing volume rather than product quality or reliability. Trina Solar presents a sharply contrasting profile: a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu, it is a consistent BloombergNEF Tier 1 incumbent and reported an annual production capacity of around 100 GW as of 2025, placing it among the three or four largest module manufacturers globally alongside LONGi and Jinko Solar. On institutional footprint and bankability acceptance in project finance, Trina Solar holds a decisive advantage.

Trina Solar's flagship range is the Vertex N series, built on N-type TOPCon cell technology. The lineup covers bifacial utility-scale modules confirmed by pv-magazine at up to 760 W with 24.5% efficiency, mid-range products for commercial and industrial applications, and the Vertex S+ aimed at residential rooftops. A bifaciality factor of 90% and a temperature coefficient of -0.28%/°C make the larger formats highly competitive in ground-mount projects where yield optimization is central to project economics. Bisol's portfolio takes a different direction, focusing on quality consistency and specialty segments. The company sorts every module by output power, voltage, and current to minimize mismatch losses within arrays - a practice it describes as unique in the industry. Beyond standard mono and TOPCon modules, Bisol offers dedicated BIPV families: Solrif (frameless tiles that integrate flush with the roof plane), Lumina (semi-transparent modules for facades and skylights), and Spectrum (colored-cell panels for heritage buildings and design-conscious projects). Its warranty terms are notably generous, with a 25-year product guarantee and a 30-year performance guarantee with a floor of 90% rated output.

For a buyer procuring panels for a conventional residential or commercial installation where bankability and supply-chain security are the primary criteria, Trina Solar is the more straightforward default. Its Tier 1 status, global project track record, and depth of distribution make financing and insurance arrangements simpler to execute. Bisol is a genuinely strong alternative for European buyers who prioritize locally manufactured product, BIPV integration, or architectural applications where colored or frameless modules are required - segments where Trina's catalog offers little differentiation. The two brands are not interchangeable: Trina Solar competes on scale, price, and institutional acceptance; Bisol competes on European provenance, specialty design capability, and warranty depth.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Bisol vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/bisol-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Bisol vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/bisol-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Bisol vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/bisol-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/bisol-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.