---
title: "Becquer vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Becquer vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Becquer vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 6 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Becquer leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Becquer | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Becquer | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 6 | 340 | +334 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 760 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 702 W | 520 W | +182 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Becquer | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 24.80% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.62% | 21.71% | +0.90 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Becquer | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.250%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.052 |
| Bifacial Share | 6 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Becquer | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 5 (83.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 1 (16.7%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

Becquer offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Becquer | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (33.3%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (66.7%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Becquer | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 6 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Becquer


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JST-FCMH-715W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-715w-hd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JST-FCMH-710W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-710w-hd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JST-FCMH-705W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-705w-hd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JST-FCMH-700W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-700w-hd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JST-FCMH-695W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-695w-hd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JST-FCMH-690W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-690w-hd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Becquer is an Indian solar manufacturer headquartered in Mumbai, founded in 2016, with its origins in industrial captive solar solutions for factories, steel mills, and food processing plants. The company operates at a relatively modest scale - annual revenues stood at roughly 92.6 crore rupees as of March 2025 - and does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module list, which currently recognizes Indian peers such as Adani Solar, Vikram Solar, and Waaree as bankable manufacturers. Trina Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer based in Changzhou, founded in 1997, and one of the most firmly established names in the global photovoltaic industry. It holds consistent BNEF Tier 1 status and was also recognized by S&P Global Commodity Insights on their inaugural Tier 1 list covering both PV modules and energy storage systems. With module production capacity reported at 95 GW in 2023 and a stated target of 120 GW by end of 2025, and cumulative 210 mm product shipments exceeding 200 GW globally as of mid-2025, Trina Solar carries a substantially larger and better-documented institutional footprint.

Becquer has built its product identity around the Indian subcontinent, serving industrial captive generation projects, dense urban rooftops, and pioneering building-integrated solar facades. The company launched what it positions as India's first BIS-approved HJT (heterojunction technology) module, with cell efficiencies in the range of 22.5-23.5%, and offers a 30-year performance and workmanship warranty on select lines - competitive terms by any standard. Trina Solar, on the other hand, covers the full application spectrum through its Vertex product family, all built on n-type TOPCon technology. The Vertex S and Vertex S+ series target residential rooftop and commercial-and-industrial installations, with modules reaching up to 485 W and efficiencies around 24.3%. For utility-scale ground-mount projects, the large-format Vertex N bifacial line - including the NEG21 series rated up to 760 W at 24.5% efficiency - leverages 210 mm G12 wafers and is designed for high-density, low-cost energy generation at scale.

For most international buyers - whether sourcing for residential, commercial, or utility-scale projects - Trina Solar is the more straightforward default choice, given its BNEF Tier 1 bankability, well-established global supply chain, and breadth of independently reviewed product lines. Becquer is a genuinely interesting proposition for buyers operating specifically within the Indian market, where its HJT technology, local certifications, and service network carry tangible weight. Outside India, however, Becquer's limited institutional track record and absence from global Tier 1 bankability lists make it a higher-risk selection for financed projects, and the two brands should not be treated as interchangeable at an international level.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Becquer vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Becquer vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Becquer vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.