---
title: "Becquer vs Jinko Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Becquer vs Jinko Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-jinko-solar"
---

# Becquer vs Jinko Solar

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 6 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Becquer leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Becquer | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Shanghai |
| Founded |  | 2006 |
| Employees |  | 33,830 |
| Annual capacity |  | 130.0 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NYSE: JKS |
| Website |  | [https://www.jinkosolar.com](https://www.jinkosolar.com) |

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Becquer | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 6 | 637 | +631 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 735 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 702 W | 523 W | +180 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Becquer | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 24.80% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.62% | 22.18% | +0.44 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Becquer | Jinko Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.250%/°C | -0.304%/°C | +0.054 |
| Bifacial Share | 6 (100%) | 231 (36%) | +64 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.7 yrs | +3.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Becquer | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 5 (83.3%) | 206 (32.3%) |
| 23%+ | 1 (16.7%) | 184 (28.9%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 23 (3.6%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 84 (13.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 140 (22.0%) |


## Power distribution

Becquer offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Becquer | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (33.3%) | 150 (23.5%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (66.7%) | 18 (2.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 50 (7.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 243 (38.1%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 176 (27.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (41%)


| Technology | Becquer | Jinko Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 6 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 258 (40.5%) |
| N-type | 0 | 195 (30.6%) |
| PERC | 0 | 158 (24.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 21 (3.3%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (0.8%) |


## Top panels, Becquer


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JST-FCMH-715W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-715w-hd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JST-FCMH-710W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-710w-hd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JST-FCMH-705W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-705w-hd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JST-FCMH-700W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-700w-hd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JST-FCMH-695W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-695w-hd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JST-FCMH-690W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-690w-hd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jinko Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-735w-bin) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm735n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-730w-bin) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm730n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-725w-bin) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinko-solar-jkm725n-66hl5-bdv-z6-eu) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (720W bin)](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinkosolar-jkm710-735n-66hl5-bdv-z3-eu-720w-bin) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Becquer and Jinko Solar represent two very different tiers of the global solar PV manufacturing landscape. Becquer is a Singapore-headquartered company founded in 2016, operating primarily across 14 states in India, with no documented presence in European markets. It offers a focused portfolio of just 6 panel models, all built exclusively on HJT (Heterojunction) cell technology, and does not hold Tier 1 bankable status. Jinko Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2006 in China, is listed on the NYSE, employs over 33,800 people, and operates a production capacity of 130 GW. It has maintained Tier 1 status for many years running and consistently ranks among the top two global module shipment leaders, with a catalogue of 545 products covering a wide range of watt classes and applications.

On the technology side, Becquer's entire portfolio is HJT and 100% bifacial, delivering an average temperature coefficient of Pmax at -0.25%/°C - notably better than Jinko's average of -0.308%/°C - and an average module power of 702.5 Wp, reflecting a tightly focused premium product line suited to high-efficiency rooftop installs and building-integrated PV applications where low thermal losses matter. Jinko's flagship technology is TOPCon, present in approximately 39% of its portfolio, with a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% - both figures exceeding Becquer's maximum of 23%. Jinko's broad catalogue, averaging 511 Wp across all products and peaking at 735 Wp, makes it suitable for residential rooftop installs, commercial and industrial (C&I) projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount developments alike, backed by an average warranty of around 28.5 years and a globally established service network.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice wherever bankability, supply-chain reliability, and proven field performance are priorities - which covers the vast majority of commercial, C&I, and utility-scale procurement. Becquer offers a technically compelling HJT proposition for buyers focused specifically on premium low-temperature-coefficient bifacial modules, but the absence of Tier 1 status, the narrow product range, and the lack of a European distribution and service footprint make it a harder sell outside its home markets of India and Singapore until these gaps are addressed.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Becquer vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Becquer vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinko-solar)
- [Becquer vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinko-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-jinko-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.