---
title: "Becquer vs JA Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Becquer vs JA Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-ja-solar"
---

# Becquer vs JA Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 6 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Becquer leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Becquer | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Beijing |
| Founded |  | 2005 |
| Employees |  | 37,289 |
| Annual capacity |  | 100+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 002459 |
| Website |  | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) |

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Becquer | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 6 | 504 | +498 |
| Max Power | 715 W | 740 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 702 W | 456 W | +246 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Becquer | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.00% | 24.80% | +1.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.62% | 21.13% | +1.48 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Becquer | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.250%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.072 |
| Bifacial Share | 6 (100%) | 238 (47%) | +53 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +2.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Becquer skews to higher efficiency: 17% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Becquer | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 5 (83.3%) | 107 (21.2%) |
| 23%+ | 1 (16.7%) | 74 (14.7%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 112 (22.2%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 99 (19.6%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 112 (22.2%) |


## Power distribution

Becquer offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Becquer | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 2 (33.3%) | 60 (11.9%) |
| 700W+ | 4 (66.7%) | 9 (1.8%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 142 (28.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 173 (34.3%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 120 (23.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Becquer | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 6 (100.0%) | 5 (1.0%) |
| PERC | 0 | 247 (49.0%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 146 (29.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 90 (17.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 16 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Becquer


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JST-FCMH-715W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-715w-hd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JST-FCMH-710W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-710w-hd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JST-FCMH-705W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-705w-hd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JST-FCMH-700W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-700w-hd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JST-FCMH-695W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-695w-hd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JST-FCMH-690W-HD](https://comparepv.com/panel/becquer-jst-fcmh-690w-hd) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.250 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Becquer and JA Solar occupy fundamentally different positions in the global solar PV landscape. Becquer was founded in 2016 in Singapore, with manufacturing and EPC operations centered in India and an expanding presence in Europe and the United States. The company remains a relatively small, non-Tier-1 manufacturer without bankable status, offering a tightly focused portfolio of just 6 panel models. JA Solar, by contrast, is one of the world's largest solar module producers, founded in China in 2005 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. With a workforce of over 37,000 employees and a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, JA Solar holds Tier 1 bankable status and maintains an extensive portfolio of 524 panel models serving markets across multiple continents. The scale and financial backing of the two companies differ substantially, which directly shapes buyer confidence and project financing options.

Becquer's entire portfolio is built around HJT (heterojunction) cell technology, with 100% bifacial modules delivering an average efficiency of 22.6% and a peak of 23%, combined with an exceptionally low average temperature coefficient of -0.25%/°C for Pmax. This makes Becquer panels a compelling choice for space-constrained residential or commercial rooftop applications where maximum energy yield per square meter matters, and for buyers who prioritize low long-term degradation and strong hot-weather performance. JA Solar's portfolio spans PERC technology - representing 52% of its lineup - alongside newer TOPCon and other advanced formats. Its peak module efficiency reaches 24.4%, while the portfolio average of 20.9% reflects the breadth of legacy PERC products still offered. JA Solar's average warranty across its range stands at nearly 28 years, and its manufacturing scale enables competitive pricing suited to residential rooftop installs, large utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I deployments alike.

For international buyers selecting between the two, the decision hinges primarily on project scale and bankability requirements. JA Solar's Tier 1 status makes it the default choice for bank-financed projects, utility-scale procurement, and supply chains where volume and financial certainty are non-negotiable. Becquer presents a technically strong case for premium installations where the combination of HJT efficiency and a superior temperature coefficient of -0.25%/°C justifies a higher per-watt cost - particularly for commercial or industrial rooftops with limited area, or for buyers focused on maximizing lifetime energy production over the lowest upfront module price.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Becquer vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ja-solar)
- [Becquer vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ja-solar)
- [Becquer vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ja-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/becquer-vs-ja-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

