---
title: "Avaada vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Avaada vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-akcome"
---

# Avaada vs AKCOME

Avaada has the broader catalog (12 vs 3 models). Avaada leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Avaada | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Mumbai | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 2003 |
| Employees | 2000-3000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 8-10 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.avaada.com](https://www.avaada.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

Avaada Group is a diversified Indian clean energy conglomerate active in renewable power generation, solar PV manufacturing, green hydrogen, battery storage, and pumped hydro. Its manufacturing arm, Avaada Electro, produces high-efficiency N-Type TOPCon solar cells and modules and is rapidly scaling capacity in Uttar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Avaada | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 12 | 3 | +9 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 700 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 630 W | 672 W | +42 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Avaada | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | 22.54% | +1.06 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.07% | 21.63% | +1.45 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Avaada | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.060 |
| Bifacial Share | 12 (100%) | 3 (100%) |  |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Avaada skews to higher efficiency: 67% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Avaada | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 4 (33.3%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 8 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Avaada | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 500-599W | 2 (16.7%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 8 (66.7%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (92%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Avaada | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 11 (91.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 1 (8.3%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Avaada


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AVN66G12G](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12g) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AVN66G12TB](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12tb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AVN66G12RG-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-630) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AVN66G12RTB](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rtb) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AVN66G12RG-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-625) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AVN66G12RG-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AVN66G12RG-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-615) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AVN72M10LTB](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn72m10ltb) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AVN66G12RG-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-610) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AVN72M10LG](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn72m10lg) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Avaada is the solar manufacturing arm of India's Avaada Group, founded in 2009 by Vineet Mittal and headquartered in India, with the broader group now running over 7 GW of operational renewable capacity and a renewable portfolio exceeding 17 GW. Its module business, Avaada Electro, is described as India's third-largest solar PV manufacturer by operational capacity and earned a Grade A ranking in Wood Mackenzie's H1 2025 Global Solar Module Manufacturer Rankings, a benchmark tied to manufacturing quality and bankability. AKCOME, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2006, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2011, and headquartered in Zhejiang province, with a sales presence in more than 80 countries. AKCOME has historically been recognized as a Tier 1 supplier and an early pioneer of heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, but industry Tier 1 tracking lists have reported it dropping off the BloombergNEF-style Tier 1 list in recent rankings, which can matter for project financing. On institutional footprint, Avaada currently holds the stronger position, backed by an independent third-party Grade A rating and a large, diversified parent conglomerate spanning generation, manufacturing, and green hydrogen.

Product-wise, Avaada focuses on N-type TOPCon bifacial modules, including high-wattage glass-glass panels around 720 Wp with efficiency near 23.18 percent, aimed primarily at utility-scale and industrial/commercial installations in the Indian market. AKCOME's catalog spans two lines: the AK iPower series built on HJT cells, where the company has pushed mass-production efficiency to roughly 25.6 percent, and the AK iTopper series using TOPCon, giving it a broader spread across premium HJT-based products and more mainstream TOPCon modules for residential, commercial, and utility segments, plus a mounting-systems business.

For a typical 2025 buyer, the choice depends on priorities: Avaada is the safer default where financability and a current third-party quality rating matter, particularly for large Indian utility-scale projects, while AKCOME remains technically credible, especially for buyers specifically wanting HJT-based high-efficiency modules, but its uncertain Tier 1 status warrants extra due diligence on financing terms before committing to large projects.

\---LINKS---

\- https://now.solar/2026/01/12/avaada-electro-secures-grade-a-in-global-solar-module-ranking-smestreet/ \| Avaada Electro secures Grade A in Wood Mackenzie global module ranking \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/25-6-akcome-pushes-its-mass-production-hjt-cell-efficiency-to-a-new-high/ \| AKCOME pushes mass-production HJT cell efficiency to 25.6 percent \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| AKCOME Technology on HJT cell production and copper plating \| article

\- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings \| Tier 1 Solar Panels List 2025: Updated Manufacturers and Rankings \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/avaada \| Avaada Energy Pvt. Ltd. company and product profile \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Avaada vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Avaada vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Avaada vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.