---
title: "Avaada vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Avaada vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-aeet"
---

# Avaada vs AEET

Avaada has the broader catalog (12 vs 5 models). Avaada leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Avaada leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Avaada | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India |  |
| Headquarters | Mumbai |  |
| Founded | 2009 |  |
| Employees | 2000-3000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 8-10 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.avaada.com](https://www.avaada.com) |  |

Avaada Group is a diversified Indian clean energy conglomerate active in renewable power generation, solar PV manufacturing, green hydrogen, battery storage, and pumped hydro. Its manufacturing arm, Avaada Electro, produces high-efficiency N-Type TOPCon solar cells and modules and is rapidly scaling capacity in Uttar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Avaada | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 12 | 5 | +7 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 200 W | +520 W |
| Avg Power | 630 W | 190 W | +440 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Avaada | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.60% | 15.70% | +7.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.07% | 14.90% | +8.17 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Avaada | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 12 (100%) | 0 (0%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Avaada skews to higher efficiency: 67% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Avaada | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 4 (33.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 8 (66.7%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Power distribution

Avaada offers more 600W+ panels (83% of lineup)


| Power band | Avaada | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 500-599W | 2 (16.7%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 8 (66.7%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 2 (16.7%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (92%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Avaada | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 11 (91.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 1 (8.3%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Avaada


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AVN66G12G](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12g) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AVN66G12TB](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12tb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AVN66G12RG-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-630) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AVN66G12RTB](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rtb) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AVN66G12RG-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-625) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AVN66G12RG-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-620) | 620 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AVN66G12RG-615](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-615) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AVN72M10LTB](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn72m10ltb) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AVN66G12RG-610](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn66g12rg-610) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AVN72M10LG](https://comparepv.com/panel/avaada-avn72m10lg) | 610 | 23.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced information now to write a qualitative, hedged comparison given AEET's more limited profile.

AEET (AEET Energy Group GmbH) is a German company founded in 2008 and based in Bad Gandersheim, Lower Saxony, operating primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale and distribution partner for the European market. According to its own materials, it works closely with established manufacturers and has some association with production sites in China, but it is not listed among the independently tracked BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturers, and no independent capacity figures in GW per year are publicly available. Avaada, through its manufacturing arm Avaada Electro, is an Indian company that has grown into the country's third-largest solar PV producer by operational capacity, reporting around 8.5 GW of operational capacity with further expansion planned toward fiscal year 2027, and it received a Grade A ranking in Wood Mackenzie's H1 2025 Global Solar Module Manufacturer Rankings. On institutional footprint, Avaada is the clearer manufacturer with verifiable scale and third-party quality benchmarking, while AEET functions more as a distribution and project-support business than a vertically integrated Tier 1 producer.

In terms of product focus, Avaada Electro is centered on N-Type TOPCon bifacial modules, with reported outputs up to 720 Wp and efficiencies around 23.18 percent, positioning it for utility-scale, commercial, and rooftop solar projects across India, backed by IEC, UL, and BIS certification along with stated 12-year product and 30-year performance warranties. AEET's public materials describe a broad module assortment sourced and distributed across European markets, including a mix of established brand-name products, but do not point to a distinct in-house cell technology or flagship product line comparable to Avaada's TOPCon platform; its role is closer to that of a regional supply and logistics partner for installers.

Given the available evidence, Avaada is the more clearly documented and verifiable choice for a typical buyer in 2025, particularly for utility-scale or commercial projects in or connected to the Indian market, thanks to its independently confirmed manufacturing capacity, modern TOPCon technology, and third-party quality ranking. AEET may still be a reasonable option for European buyers seeking a long-established wholesale partner with access to multiple brands, but its lack of independent Tier 1 or BNEF-style verification means buyers should evaluate the specific underlying module manufacturer on a case-by-case basis rather than treating AEET itself as a bankability signal.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.avaada.com/solar-manufacturing/ \| Avaada Electro solar manufacturing overview and capacity \| article

\- https://now.solar/2026/01/12/avaada-electro-secures-grade-a-in-global-solar-module-ranking-smestreet/ \| Avaada Electro secures Grade A in global solar module ranking \| article

\- https://assets.bnef.com/public/tiering/solarmodules.pdf \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Methodology \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile on ENF Solar \| article

\- https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/page/modulfertigung.php \| AEET Energy Group module production and sourcing overview \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Avaada vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [Avaada vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [Avaada vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/avaada-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.