---
title: "AUSTA ENERGY vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AUSTA ENERGY vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/austa-energy-vs-hyundai"
---

# AUSTA ENERGY vs Hyundai

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 58 models). AUSTA ENERGY leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Surat | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
| Employees | 200 | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 1 GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://www.austaenergy.com](https://www.austaenergy.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

AUSTA Energy is an Indian solar panel manufacturer based in Surat, Gujarat. The company produces monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules for residential and commercial applications, focusing on the domestic Indian market and select export markets.

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 58 | 65 | +7 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 640 W | +90 W |
| Avg Power | 571 W | 442 W | +128 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 23.40% | +0.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.85% | 21.49% | +0.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.295%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 36 (62%) | 43 (66%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AUSTA ENERGY skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 7 (12.1%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 24 (41.4%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 23 (39.7%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (6.9%) | 4 (6.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (10.8%) |


## Power distribution

AUSTA ENERGY offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 12 (20.7%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (41.4%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 15 (25.9%) | 3 (4.6%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (12.1%) | 0 |
| \<400W | 0 | 8 (12.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (55%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | AUSTA ENERGY | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 32 (55.2%) | 6 (9.2%) |
| PERC | 21 (36.2%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| HJT | 4 (6.9%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| N-type | 1 (1.7%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |


## Top panels, AUSTA ENERGY


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ODA730-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda730-33v-mhd) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ODA725-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda725-33v-mhd) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ODA720-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda720-33v-mhd) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ODA715-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda715-33v-mhd) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ODA710-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda710-33v-mhd) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ODA705-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda705-33v-mhd) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ODA700-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda700-33v-mhd) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ODA695-33V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda695-33v-mhd) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.223 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ODA640-30V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda640-30v-mhd) | 640 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ODA635-30V-MHD](https://comparepv.com/panel/austa-energy-oda635-30v-mhd) | 635 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AUSTA ENERGY and HD Hyundai Energy Solutions represent two distinct points on the solar manufacturing spectrum. AUSTA ENERGY, headquartered in India and founded in 2015, is a relatively young manufacturer with a reported production capacity of 1 GW and a workforce of around 200 employees; it does not currently hold Tier 1 bankable status and is not listed on any public stock exchange. Hyundai Energy Solutions, by contrast, is a South Korean manufacturer founded in 2004 with 1.35 GW of annual production capacity, confirmed Tier 1 bankable certification, and a listing on the Korea Stock Exchange - giving it a considerably stronger institutional footprint and easier access to project financing from risk-averse lenders.

Looking at their portfolios, the two companies serve somewhat different market segments. AUSTA's lineup skews toward high-output formats, averaging 570.7 Wp per panel with a maximum of 730 Wp, and posts an average module efficiency of 21.85% peaking at 23.5%, driven primarily by N-type cell technology across 46.6% of its 58-panel catalogue. Some 62.1% of its modules are bifacial, and the company backs them with an average 30-year product warranty - making this range a plausible fit for utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount arrays where raw wattage and long coverage periods matter. Hyundai's range centers on a lower average output of 442.3 Wp (maximum 640 Wp), with average efficiency of 21.49% and a ceiling of 23.4%, built around heterojunction (HJT) technology at 38.5% of its 65-panel catalogue. Its bifacial share of 66.2% is marginally higher than AUSTA's, though its average warranty of 27.4 years trails slightly, and its more moderate wattage range aligns better with premium residential and mid-scale commercial rooftop projects.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Hyundai's Tier 1 bankable status is the decisive practical advantage - project lenders and EPC contractors routinely require it as a baseline threshold, making Hyundai the lower-risk default for any financed installation. AUSTA's higher wattage ceiling and longer warranty are genuine merits for buyers in markets where bankability requirements are less stringent, but its lack of Tier 1 recognition remains a meaningful barrier for internationally financed projects. Where financing constraints do not apply and the buyer can independently assess manufacturer risk, the two are more comparable than their reputational gap might otherwise suggest.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete Review of Hyundai Solar Panels 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Review: Cost, Ratings and Reviews - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/hyundai \| Hyundai Solar Panel Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/bankability-what-is-it-how-do-you-assess-it/ \| What Is Bankability? Manufacturer Reliability Overview - EnergySage \| article

Sources:

\- \[Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review (Cost, Ratings & Reviews in 2026)\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/hyundai)

\- \[What Is Bankability? Manufacturer Reliability Overview - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/bankability-what-is-it-how-do-you-assess-it/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AUSTA ENERGY vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/austa-energy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [AUSTA ENERGY vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/austa-energy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [AUSTA ENERGY vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/austa-energy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/austa-energy-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.