---
title: "AU Optronics vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AU Optronics vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-znshine"
---

# AU Optronics vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 1 models). ZNShine leads on peak efficiency at 22.83%. ZNShine leans bifacial (42% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AU Optronics | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| Headquarters | Hsinchu | Suqian |
| Founded | 1996 | 1988 |
| Employees | 41000+ | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity |  | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | TWSE (Taiwan Stock Exchange): 2409 | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.auo.com/en-global](https://www.auo.com/en-global) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

AU Optronics (AUO) is a technology-driven company based in Taiwan, specializing in optoelectronics and display solutions. They deliver products and services that advance innovation in areas like display technology, system solutions, industrial intelligence, healthcare, and energy. AUO operates globally across Asia...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AU Optronics | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 212 | +211 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 670 W | +500 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 535 W | +365 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AU Optronics | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.83% | +6.83 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 21.35% | +5.35 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AU Optronics | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.109 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 89 (42%) | +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.3 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | AU Optronics | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 47 (22.2%) |


## Power distribution

ZNShine offers more 600W+ panels (20% of lineup)


| Power band | AU Optronics | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 43 (20.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | AU Optronics | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 134 (63.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 78 (36.8%) |


## Top panels, AU Optronics


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/au-optronics-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AU Optronics vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [AU Optronics vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [AU Optronics vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.