---
title: "AU Optronics vs Jolywood - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AU Optronics vs Jolywood solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-jolywood"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/au-optronics/jolywood.png"
---

# AU Optronics vs Jolywood

Jolywood has the broader catalog (128 vs 1 models). Jolywood leads on peak efficiency at 23.60%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AU Optronics | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| Headquarters | Hsinchu | Taizhou |
| Founded | 1996 | 2008 |
| Employees | 41000+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | TWSE (Taiwan Stock Exchange): 2409 | SZSE: 300393 |
| Website | [https://www.auo.com/en-global](https://www.auo.com/en-global) | [https://www.jolywood.cn](https://www.jolywood.cn) |

AU Optronics (AUO) is a technology-driven company based in Taiwan, specializing in optoelectronics and display solutions. They deliver products and services that advance innovation in areas like display technology, system solutions, industrial intelligence, healthcare, and energy. AUO operates globally across Asia...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AU Optronics | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 128 | +127 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 715 W | +545 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 554 W | +384 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AU Optronics | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.60% | +7.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.54% | +6.54 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AU Optronics | Jolywood | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.154 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 110 (86%) | +86 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Jolywood skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AU Optronics | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 0 | 11 (8.6%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 89 (69.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 28 (21.9%) |


## Power distribution

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)


| Power band | AU Optronics | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 42 (32.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 38 (29.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 40 (31.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 8 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (95%)


| Technology | AU Optronics | Jolywood |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 122 (95.3%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (4.7%) |


## Top panels, AU Optronics


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/au-optronics-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Jolywood


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JW-HD132N-715W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JW-HD132N-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JW-HD132N-710W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710w) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JW-HD132N-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JW-HD132N-705W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705w) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JW-HD132N-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JW-HD132N-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JW-HD132N-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JW-HD132N-695](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JW-HD132N-695W](https://comparepv.com/panel/jolywood-taizhou-solar-technology-co-ltd-jw-hd132n-695w) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AU Optronics vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jolywood)
- [AU Optronics vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jolywood)
- [AU Optronics vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Jolywood](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jolywood)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-jolywood

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.