---
title: "AU Optronics vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AU Optronics vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-hyundai"
---

# AU Optronics vs Hyundai

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 1 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AU Optronics | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Taiwan | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Hsinchu | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 1996 | 2004 |
| Employees | 41000+ | 206 |
| Annual capacity |  | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | TWSE (Taiwan Stock Exchange): 2409 | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://www.auo.com/en-global](https://www.auo.com/en-global) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

AU Optronics (AUO) is a technology-driven company based in Taiwan, specializing in optoelectronics and display solutions. They deliver products and services that advance innovation in areas like display technology, system solutions, industrial intelligence, healthcare, and energy. AUO operates globally across Asia...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AU Optronics | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 65 | +64 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 640 W | +470 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 442 W | +272 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AU Optronics | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.40% | +7.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 21.49% | +5.49 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AU Optronics | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.138 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 43 (66%) | +66 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.4 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AU Optronics | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)


| Power band | AU Optronics | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 3 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | AU Optronics | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 9 (13.8%) |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 6 (9.2%) |


## Top panels, AU Optronics


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/au-optronics-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AU Optronics vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [AU Optronics vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [AU Optronics vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/au-optronics-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.