---
title: "Astronergy vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-znshine"
---

# Astronergy vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 150 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Astronergy leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Astronergy | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hangzhou | Suqian |
| Founded | 2006 | 1988 |
| Employees | 12000+ | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 76+ GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: SHA: 601877 | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [http://www.astronergy.com/](http://www.astronergy.com/) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Astronergy | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 212 | +62 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 670 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 535 W | +5 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Astronergy | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 22.83% | +1.97 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.71% | 21.35% | +1.36 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Astronergy | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.036 |
| Bifacial Share | 104 (69%) | 89 (42%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +1.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Astronergy | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 6 (4.0%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (9.3%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 72 (48.0%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 58 (38.7%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (2.4%) |


## Power distribution

Astronergy offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)


| Power band | Astronergy | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (5.3%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 58 (38.7%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (16.0%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 53 (35.3%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.7%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (89%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | Astronergy | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 133 (88.7%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| PERC | 12 (8.0%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| N-type | 5 (3.3%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Astronergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-665) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Astronergy is a Chinese solar module manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, operating as a subsidiary of the CHINT Group, one of China's largest energy conglomerates. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status with BloombergNEF and was included in S&P Global Commodity Insights' inaugural 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Companies list. In 2024 Astronergy ranked sixth globally by module shipment volume at approximately 40 GW for the year, with cumulative global deliveries surpassing 150 GW. ZNShine - formally ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd. - is a Chinese manufacturer based in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, that has maintained a consistent Tier 1 BNEF rating since 2015 and recently achieved a B rating in PV Tech's bankability ranking. Its combined production capacity stands at around 10 GW across three Chinese manufacturing bases, with expansion underway in Indonesia and a planned joint-venture line in India. On institutional footprint and manufacturing scale, Astronergy is the substantially larger and more widely recognized brand.

Astronergy serves residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount markets, with its product catalog dominated by n-type TOPCon technology - a position validated by the company ranking fourth globally in n-type TOPCon module shipments in 2024. Its Astro N7 anti-dust series, suited to agri-PV and large industrial rooftops, entered mass production in 2025. Eight consecutive years as a Kiwa PVEL Top Performer and the 2024 RETC Overall Highest Achiever award reinforce confidence in consistent module quality. ZNShine focuses primarily on monocrystalline modules for residential and mid-scale commercial applications, and has pursued differentiation through graphene-enhanced cell coatings intended to improve durability and reduce degradation. However, ZNShine's technology mix has not been as publicly benchmarked in independent third-party testing programs as Astronergy's.

For most international buyers - project developers, EPCs, or commercial installers evaluating bankable suppliers - Astronergy is the stronger default choice, backed by greater production scale, deeper third-party validation, and an established presence across more than 140 countries. ZNShine is a credible Tier 1 option for cost-sensitive projects where a bankable brand suffices and premium technology differentiation is not required. The two brands are broadly interchangeable on paper bankability alone, but Astronergy carries a meaningfully wider margin of institutional confidence.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Astronergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Astronergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Astronergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.