---
title: "Astronergy vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-runergy"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/astronergy/runergy.png"
---

# Astronergy vs Runergy

Astronergy has the broader catalog (150 vs 124 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Astronergy | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hangzhou | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2006 | 2013 |
| Employees | 12000+ | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 76+ GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: SHA: 601877 |  |
| Website | [http://www.astronergy.com/](http://www.astronergy.com/) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Astronergy | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 124 | +26 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 740 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 579 W | +40 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Astronergy | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.10% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.71% | 22.42% | +0.29 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Astronergy | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.005 |
| Bifacial Share | 104 (69%) | 95 (77%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Astronergy | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 6 (4.0%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (9.3%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 72 (48.0%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 58 (38.7%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Astronergy | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (5.3%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 58 (38.7%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (16.0%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 53 (35.3%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.7%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (89%)

Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%)


| Technology | Astronergy | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 133 (88.7%) | 0 |
| PERC | 12 (8.0%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| N-type | 5 (3.3%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, Astronergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-665) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runergy is a Chinese solar cell and module manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu, China, and has expanded into US manufacturing with a facility in Huntsville, Alabama. It has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module maker status for six consecutive quarters through early 2025 and reported cumulative solar cell shipments exceeding 65 GW by the end of 2023. Astronergy, operating under China's CHINT Group, was founded in 2006 and is one of the earliest private companies to enter the Chinese photovoltaic sector, giving it roughly two decades of manufacturing experience. Astronergy is also confirmed as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturer for 2025, was named a Tier 1 PV Module Supplier in S&P Global's 2025 Cleantech Companies list, and reports production capacity in the range of 56 to 76 GW along with cumulative global shipments surpassing 150 GW, including 18.5 GW in the first half of 2025 alone. On institutional footprint and scale, Astronergy currently presents the stronger profile, backed by a longer operating history, larger reported capacity, and broader third-party bankability recognition.

Both manufacturers center their product lines on n-type TOPCon cell technology, though Runergy also maintains a PERC-based portfolio and has introduced third-generation TOPCon modules with cell efficiencies reported near 26.9 percent, alongside its proprietary RunPass rear-passivation technology. Astronergy markets its ASTRO series, including the N5, N7, and N8 module lines, in bifacial and monofacial formats using large-format wafers, positioning them across utility-scale power plants, commercial and industrial rooftops, and residential installations. Runergy's product messaging leans toward high-efficiency TOPCon modules for utility and commercial-scale projects, supported by its growing US manufacturing base aimed at domestic-content requirements.

For a typical buyer in 2025, both brands qualify as bankable Tier 1 options with modern TOPCon technology, so the choice often comes down to regional availability and specific project scale rather than a clear performance gap. Astronergy's longer track record, larger production scale, and broader certification recognition make it a slightly safer default for large or institutional projects, while Runergy's growing US manufacturing presence may appeal to buyers prioritizing domestic content or newer high-efficiency TOPCon variants.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/astronergy-jumps-to-top-6-among-module-manufacturers-in-2023-bloombergnef-bankability-ranking/ \| Astronergy jumps to top 6 in 2023 BloombergNEF bankability ranking \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/intersolar-europe-2026-runergy-launches-topcon-module-conversion-efficiency-26-9/ \| Runergy launches TOPCon module with 26.9% cell efficiency \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/runergy-introduces-topcon-cell-with-269-conversion-efficiency \| Runergy introduces TOPCon cell with 26.9% conversion efficiency \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/10/10/runergy-urges-us-to-revoke-two-of-trina-solars-topcon-patents/ \| Runergy urges US to revoke two of Trina Solar's TOPCon patents \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/astronergy \| Astronergy Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Astronergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [Astronergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [Astronergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.