---
title: "Astronergy vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-q-cells"
---

# Astronergy vs Q-Cells

Astronergy has the broader catalog (150 vs 89 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Astronergy leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Astronergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Hangzhou | Seoul |
| Founded | 2006 | 1999 |
| Employees | 12000+ | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity | 76+ GW/year | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: SHA: 601877 | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website | [http://www.astronergy.com/](http://www.astronergy.com/) | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Astronergy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 89 | +61 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 675 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 468 W | +71 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Astronergy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.20% | +1.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.71% | 21.21% | +1.49 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Astronergy | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.031 |
| Bifacial Share | 104 (69%) | 35 (39%) | +30 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Astronergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 6 (4.0%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (9.3%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 72 (48.0%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 58 (38.7%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Astronergy offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)


| Power band | Astronergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (5.3%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 58 (38.7%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (16.0%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 53 (35.3%) | 17 (19.1%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.7%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (89%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Astronergy | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 133 (88.7%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| PERC | 12 (8.0%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| N-type | 5 (3.3%) | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, Astronergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-665) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Astronergy, established in 2006 as a subsidiary of China's CHINT Group and headquartered in Hangzhou, has grown into a high-volume global shipper, reporting cumulative module shipments exceeding 150 GW and 18.5 GW of shipments in the first half of 2025 alone. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, ranked among the top six manufacturers in BloombergNEF's 2023 assessment, and was recognized as a Tier 1 PV Module Supplier in S&P Global's inaugural 2025 Cleantech Companies list. Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Qcells after South Korea's Hanwha Solutions acquired the originally German brand, likewise carries BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and, according to Wood Mackenzie's U.S. PV Leaderboard, holds the leading market-share position in both U.S. residential and commercial segments. Qcells also runs the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia, giving it a meaningful domestic supply-chain advantage in North America. On the strength of its Western market penetration and institutional relationships, Qcells currently commands the stronger brand footprint in regulated, finance-heavy project environments.

Astronergy's current product lineup is anchored by N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the ASTRO N5 and ASTRO N7 families, with the N5 series oriented toward utility-scale and large commercial ground mounts and the N7 series, including an all-black variant, aimed at residential and commercial rooftop applications. The company also retains PERC modules for price-sensitive projects. Qcells structures its portfolio around the Q.TRON family, built on the company's proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO N-type TOPCon cell technology, targeting premium residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial systems, with the Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ serving the all-black residential niche. Both manufacturers have made N-type TOPCon the centerpiece of their 2025 product strategies.

For most buyers in 2025, the two brands are closely matched: both appeared among top performers across multiple categories in the 2025 Renewable Energy Test Center reliability and quality evaluations. Qcells is the stronger default for North American residential or commercial buyers who value domestically produced panels, deep installer networks, or IRA domestic-content compliance. Astronergy is a compelling alternative where budget pressure is real and domestic content is not a hard requirement, particularly in utility-scale or international markets where its scale drives competitive module pricing. Neither brand should be ruled out on quality grounds.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/astronergy/ \| Astronergy Solar Panels - EnergySage overview \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/06/11/top-solar-modules-in-reliability-quality-and-performance-testing/ \| Top solar modules in reliability, quality and performance testing 2025 \| article

\- https://solarquarter.com/2024/01/24/astronergy-ranked-a-in-pv-moduletech-bankability-ratings/ \| Astronergy Ranked A in PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings \| article

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch \| review

Sources:

\- \[Astronergy Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/astronergy/)

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Top solar modules in reliability, quality and performance testing 2025 - PV Magazine USA\](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/06/11/top-solar-modules-in-reliability-quality-and-performance-testing/)

\- \[Astronergy Ranked A in PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings - SolarQuarter\](https://solarquarter.com/2024/01/24/astronergy-ranked-a-in-pv-moduletech-bankability-ratings/)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Astronergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [Astronergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [Astronergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.