---
title: "Astronergy vs JA Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy vs JA Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-ja-solar"
---

# Astronergy vs JA Solar

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 150 models). Astronergy leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Astronergy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hangzhou | Beijing |
| Founded | 2006 | 2005 |
| Employees | 12000+ | 37,289 |
| Annual capacity | 76+ GW/year | 100+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: SHA: 601877 | SZSE: 002459 |
| Website | [http://www.astronergy.com/](http://www.astronergy.com/) | [https://www.jasolar.com](https://www.jasolar.com) |

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Astronergy | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 504 | +354 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 740 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 456 W | +83 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Astronergy | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.71% | 21.13% | +1.57 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Astronergy | JA Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.322%/°C | +0.029 |
| Bifacial Share | 104 (69%) | 238 (47%) | +22 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Astronergy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 6 (4.0%) | 99 (19.6%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (9.3%) | 112 (22.2%) |
| 22-23% | 72 (48.0%) | 107 (21.2%) |
| 23%+ | 58 (38.7%) | 74 (14.7%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 112 (22.2%) |


## Power distribution

Astronergy offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)


| Power band | Astronergy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (5.3%) | 142 (28.2%) |
| 400-499W | 58 (38.7%) | 173 (34.3%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (16.0%) | 120 (23.8%) |
| 600-699W | 53 (35.3%) | 60 (11.9%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.7%) | 9 (1.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (89%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Astronergy | JA Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 133 (88.7%) | 146 (29.0%) |
| PERC | 12 (8.0%) | 247 (49.0%) |
| N-type | 5 (3.3%) | 90 (17.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 16 (3.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 5 (1.0%) |


## Top panels, Astronergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-665) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, JA Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [JAM66D46-740/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-740-lb) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [JAM66D46-735/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-735-lb) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [JAM66D46-730/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-730-lb) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [JAM66D46-725/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-725-lb) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [JAM66D46-720/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-720-lb) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [JAM66D46-715/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-715-lb) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [JAM66D46-710/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-710-lb) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [JAM66D46-705/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-705-lb) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [JAM66D46-700/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-700-lb) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [JAM66D46-695/LB](https://comparepv.com/panel/ja-solar-jam66d46-695-lb) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Astronergy and JA Solar are both Chinese Tier 1 bankable solar module manufacturers with substantial global operations, yet they differ significantly in scale, portfolio breadth, and technology orientation. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, employs over 37,000 people and operates with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, placing it consistently among the top three module manufacturers in the world - it tied for first place in Wood Mackenzie's 2025 Grade A manufacturer ranking with a score of 90.4 points. Astronergy, founded in 2006 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, has over 12,000 employees and a production capacity of more than 76 GW, ranking sixth globally by shipment volume in 2024. The most defining difference between the two lies in their technology mix: Astronergy has concentrated 72.8% of its 136-model catalogue on N-type TOPCon cells, which drives a notably higher average module efficiency of 22.6% and a bifacial share of 66.2%. JA Solar's broader 524-model portfolio still leans heavily on PERC technology - accounting for 52.1% of its lineup - resulting in an average efficiency of 20.9% and a bifacial share of 44.3%, though its Deep Blue 4.0 series brings competitive TOPCon options to market. Both companies resolved a long-running TOPCon patent dispute through a cross-licensing agreement in late 2025, removing a significant source of commercial uncertainty for European and global buyers.

In terms of practical deployment scenarios, Astronergy's TOPCon-focused portfolio - supported by a lower average temperature coefficient of -0.295%/°C, compared to -0.323%/°C for JA Solar, and a near-30-year average performance warranty - makes it particularly well suited to residential rooftop installations where space efficiency and long-term yield stability are critical, as well as commercial C&I projects where high power density is a priority. Its high bifacial share also makes it competitive for ground-mount systems that can exploit albedo gains. JA Solar's strengths lie in portfolio depth and global supply chain scale: with 524 models, a maximum panel power of 740 Wp, and one of the broadest distribution networks in the industry, it is a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large C&I procurement programs where flexibility, volume availability, and supply security take precedence.

For international buyers selecting between the two, Astronergy represents the stronger proposition when efficiency leadership, superior temperature performance, and TOPCon technology maturity are the primary selection criteria - especially in space-constrained or thermally demanding environments. JA Solar is the better fit when portfolio versatility, proven global logistics, and large-volume procurement terms are paramount, making it a reliable anchor supplier for developers and EPC contractors working across multiple market segments simultaneously.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Astronergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-ja-solar)
- [Astronergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-ja-solar)
- [Astronergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-ja-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-ja-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.