---
title: "Astronergy vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-hyundai"
---

# Astronergy vs Hyundai

Astronergy has the broader catalog (150 vs 65 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Astronergy | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Hangzhou | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2006 | 2004 |
| Employees | 12000+ | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 76+ GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: SHA: 601877 | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [http://www.astronergy.com/](http://www.astronergy.com/) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Astronergy | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 65 | +85 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 640 W | +95 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 442 W | +97 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Astronergy | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 23.40% | +1.40 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.71% | 21.49% | +1.21 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Astronergy | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 104 (69%) | 43 (66%) | +3 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Astronergy | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 6 (4.0%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (9.3%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 72 (48.0%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 58 (38.7%) | 4 (6.2%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 7 (10.8%) |


## Power distribution

Astronergy offers more 600W+ panels (40% of lineup)


| Power band | Astronergy | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (5.3%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 58 (38.7%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (16.0%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 53 (35.3%) | 3 (4.6%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.7%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (89%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | Astronergy | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 133 (88.7%) | 6 (9.2%) |
| PERC | 12 (8.0%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| N-type | 5 (3.3%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |


## Top panels, Astronergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-665) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Now I have enough research to write the comparison.

Astronergy and Hyundai Energy Solutions represent two notably different scales of solar manufacturing. Astronergy, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, has scaled to over 76 GW of annual production capacity with a workforce exceeding 12,000 employees and trades on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Hyundai Energy Solutions, the solar division founded in 2004 out of South Korea's Hyundai conglomerate, operates at a far more modest 1.35 GW of production capacity with roughly 206 staff, listed on the Korea Stock Exchange. Both carry Tier 1 bankable status - an important threshold for project financing - but Astronergy's institutional footprint is substantially larger, having ranked in BloombergNEF's top six module manufacturers by bankability in 2023 and earning Tier 1 designation from S&P Global Commodity Insights.

The two lineups diverge meaningfully on technical ambition and scale. Astronergy's 136-model portfolio averages 527.6 Wp and 22.6% efficiency, reaching 730 Wp and 24.1% at the top end, with 72.8% of panels using n-type TOPCon cell technology and a strong average temperature coefficient of -0.295%/°C. The average product warranty sits at 29.6 years. Roughly 66.2% of its lineup is bifacial, making it well-suited for utility-scale ground mounts and large commercial rooftops where high power density and low degradation are priorities. Hyundai's 65-model portfolio averages 442.3 Wp and 21.5% efficiency, topping out at 640 Wp and 23.4%, with HJT cells representing the premium tier at 38.5% of the portfolio and a slightly softer temperature coefficient of -0.300%/°C. Warranties average 27.4 years, and bifacial share is nearly identical at 66.2%. Hyundai's lineup is a natural fit for premium residential installations and smaller commercial projects where brand recognition and HJT's low-light performance carry weight.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Astronergy is the more practical default at any meaningful project scale - its breadth, production volume, and consistent TOPCon efficiency numbers give it an edge in availability and bankability for larger installations. Hyundai is a credible choice for residential buyers who value a legacy brand and prefer HJT technology, but its constrained production base of 1.35 GW versus Astronergy's 76+ GW means tighter supply and potentially less competitive module pricing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/astronergy-jumps-to-top-6-among-module-manufacturers-in-2023-bloombergnef-bankability-ranking/ \| Astronergy jumps to top 6 in 2023 BloombergNEF bankability ranking \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Complete review of Hyundai solar panels - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/hyundai-solar-panels-review \| Hyundai solar panels review - Clean Energy Reviews \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/07/astronergy-launches-670-w-topcon-solar-module-with-24-9-efficiency/ \| Astronergy launches 670 W TOPCon module with 24.8% efficiency - pv magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/astronergy-solar-panels-review/ \| Astronergy solar panel independent review - SolarChoice \| review

Sources:

\- \[Astronergy Jumps to Top 6 Among Module Manufacturers in 2023 BloombergNEF Bankability Ranking\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/astronergy-jumps-to-top-6-among-module-manufacturers-in-2023-bloombergnef-bankability-ranking/)

\- \[Complete Review Of Hyundai Solar Panels In 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Hyundai solar panels Review - Clean Energy Reviews\](https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/hyundai-solar-panels-review)

\- \[Astronergy launches 670 W TOPCon solar module - pv magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/07/astronergy-launches-670-w-topcon-solar-module-with-24-9-efficiency/)

\- \[Astronergy Solar Panel Independent Review - SolarChoice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/astronergy-solar-panels-review/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Astronergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [Astronergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [Astronergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.