---
title: "Astronergy vs GCL - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Astronergy vs GCL solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-gcl"
---

# Astronergy vs GCL

GCL has the broader catalog (232 vs 150 models). Astronergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Astronergy | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Hangzhou | Suzhou/Hong Kong |
| Founded | 2006 | 1990 |
| Employees | 12000+ | 6000+ |
| Annual capacity | 76+ GW/year | 30+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | Shanghai Stock Exchange: SHA: 601877 | Hong Kong Stock Exchange/Shenzhen Stock Exchange: 03800.HK/002506.SZ |
| Website | [http://www.astronergy.com/](http://www.astronergy.com/) | [http://www.gcltech.com/](http://www.gcltech.com/) |

Astronergy is a global manufacturer and supplier of solar modules, and a subsidiary of Chint Group, one of the world's leading providers of smart energy solutions. The company focuses on the R&D, production, and sales of high-efficiency crystalline silicon PV cells and PV modules. Astronergy has established...

GCL is a global company focusing on green energy and high-efficiency photovoltaic materials. They are known for their innovation in polysilicon and wafer technologies, with a focus on low-carbon solutions. GCL is committed to building a low-carbon PV value chain and advancing global clean energy transformation.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Astronergy | GCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 150 | 232 | +82 |
| Max Power | 735 W | 740 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 540 W | 558 W | +19 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Astronergy | GCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.80% | 24.50% | +0.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.71% | 22.03% | +0.68 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Astronergy | GCL | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.293%/°C | -0.320%/°C | +0.027 |
| Bifacial Share | 104 (69%) | 151 (65%) | +4 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.6 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Astronergy skews to higher efficiency: 39% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Astronergy | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 6 (4.0%) | 43 (18.5%) |
| 21-22% | 14 (9.3%) | 73 (31.5%) |
| 22-23% | 72 (48.0%) | 48 (20.7%) |
| 23%+ | 58 (38.7%) | 66 (28.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 2 (0.9%) |


## Power distribution

GCL offers more 600W+ panels (44% of lineup)


| Power band | Astronergy | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (5.3%) | 6 (2.6%) |
| 400-499W | 58 (38.7%) | 60 (25.9%) |
| 500-599W | 24 (16.0%) | 63 (27.2%) |
| 600-699W | 53 (35.3%) | 81 (34.9%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (4.7%) | 22 (9.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (89%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)


| Technology | Astronergy | GCL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 133 (88.7%) | 108 (46.6%) |
| PERC | 12 (8.0%) | 102 (44.0%) |
| N-type | 5 (3.3%) | 10 (4.3%) |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (3.0%) |
| BIPV | 0 | 5 (2.2%) |


## Top panels, Astronergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CHSM66N(DG)/F-BH-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chint-new-energy-technology-co-ltd-chsm66n-dg-f-bh-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-670) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq) | 670 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CHSM66RN(DG)/F-BQ-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/astronergy-chsm66rn-dg-f-bq-665) | 665 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, GCL


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [NT12/66GDF-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [NT12/66GDF-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF 725](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-725-1) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [GCL-NH12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nh12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [GCL-NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NT12/66GDF-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/gcl-nt12-66gdf-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Astronergy is a Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Haining, Zhejiang Province, operating as the solar division of the CHINT Group, a diversified energy conglomerate established in 1984. The company shipped approximately 40 GW of modules in 2024, ranking sixth globally by shipment volume, and its cumulative deliveries have surpassed 150 GW. In 2025, Astronergy was recognized as a Tier 1 PV Module Supplier by S&P Global Commodity Insights, giving it a clear bankability standing with project finance institutions. GCL-SI (GCL System Integration), the module arm of the broader GCL Group - founded in 1990 and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange since 2007 - is headquartered in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province. GCL-SI reports an annual module production capacity of around 30 GW and has announced plans for a 60 GW factory in Hefei. The company held Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status in prior years, though independent sources suggest its current bankability classification is less straightforward than Astronergy's. On institutional footprint, Astronergy currently holds the stronger position with international project lenders.

Astronergy's lineup is anchored in N-type TOPCon technology, which makes up the bulk of its catalog. The company earned Top Performer recognition in PV Evolution Labs reliability testing and backs its main series with a 30-year performance warranty - factors that resonate with both residential installers and utility-scale developers seeking long-term yield certainty. GCL-SI has similarly centered its 2025 offering on N-type TOPCon modules, with mass-produced units reaching efficiencies above 23% and output levels above 600 W in large formats. Beyond mainstream TOPCon, GCL-SI has entered the back-contact segment with its GPC2.0 series, targeting premium commercial and utility projects where power density commands a premium. Both manufacturers serve residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount applications.

For most buyers - whether installers supplying residential projects or developers securing project finance for utility plants - Astronergy is the more straightforward default today, owing to its cleaner Tier 1 bankability credentials and independently verified reliability results. GCL-SI is a credible alternative, particularly for buyers drawn to its back-contact module technology or able to leverage GCL's vertically integrated silicon supply chain. Where standard TOPCon performance at competitive pricing is the primary driver, the two brands are broadly interchangeable, and the specific financing terms and warranty conditions of a given order will often matter more than the nameplate on the panel.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Astronergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs GCL](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-gcl)
- [Astronergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs GCL](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-gcl)
- [Astronergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs GCL](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-gcl)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/astronergy-vs-gcl

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.