--- title: "ASM vs Twinsel Electronic Technology - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ASM vs Twinsel Electronic Technology solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-twinsel" --- # ASM vs Twinsel Electronic Technology Twinsel Electronic Technology has the broader catalog (17 vs 1 models). Twinsel Electronic Technology leads on peak efficiency at 22.50%. Twinsel Electronic Technology leans bifacial (71% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Australia | | | Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | | | Founded | 2009 | | | Employees | 1-10 | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | | Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 1 | 17 | +16 | | Max Power | 170 W | 700 W | +530 W | | Avg Power | 170 W | 646 W | +476 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.50% | +6.50 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 21.86% | +5.86 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.272%/°C | +0.166 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 12 (71%) | +71 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 28.5 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 0 | 2 (11.8%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 6 (35.3%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 9 (52.9%) | ## Power distribution Twinsel Electronic Technology offers more 600W+ panels (71% of lineup) | Power band | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 0 | 5 (29.4%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 10 (58.8%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 2 (11.8%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (71%) | Technology | ASM | Twinsel Electronic Technology | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | HJT | 0 | 12 (70.6%) | | PERC | 0 | 5 (29.4%) | ## Top panels, ASM | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Twinsel Electronic Technology | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM132-8-675-700BHDG (700W variant)](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-675-700bhdg-700w-variant) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM132-8-700BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-700bhdg) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM132-8-675-700BHDG (695W variant)](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-675-700bhdg-695w-variant) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM132-8-695BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-695bhdg) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM132-8-675-700BHDG (690W variant)](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-675-700bhdg-690w-variant) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM132-8-690BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-690bhdg) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM132-8-675-700BHDG (685W variant)](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-675-700bhdg-685w-variant) | 685 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM132-8-685BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-685bhdg) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM132-8-675-700BHDG (680W variant)](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-675-700bhdg-680w-variant) | 680 | 22.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM132-8-680BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/twinsel-electronic-technology-tsm132-8-680bhdg) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary ASM, trading as Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, is a small-scale panel manufacturer based in Australia, offering domestically produced monocrystalline modules aimed primarily at the residential rooftop segment. No credible third-party source places ASM on a BloombergNEF Tier 1 list or assigns it a comparable bankability rating, and its publicly visible catalog reflects an older generation of relatively low-wattage panels. Twinsel Electronic Technology - formally Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. - is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Ninghai County, Zhejiang Province and founded in 2011. Its business spans photovoltaic modules alongside LED lighting and off-grid energy products, and it holds certifications including CE, TUV, UL, and SAA. Twinsel does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists in publicly available quarterly updates, though ENF Solar records it as an active module supplier with international distribution reaching nearly 50 countries. On balance, Twinsel carries the broader institutional footprint. Twinsel's catalog, as documented in ENF Solar datasheets, extends from mid-range residential panels to higher-wattage modules in the 675-700 W class, pointing to a product line that spans residential rooftops and small commercial ground-mount applications. Its panels use monocrystalline cell technology, consistent with the dominant standard across mid-tier Chinese suppliers. ASM's visible product range is considerably narrower, with datasheets on record for panels in the 170-200 W class - a specification tier that has largely been superseded in new installations by higher-density formats. For a typical buyer in 2025-2026 who values broad certification coverage and a wider wattage range, Twinsel offers a more versatile proposition. That said, neither brand has attained the Tier 1 bankability status associated with the largest global manufacturers, so buyers financing utility-scale or large commercial projects through institutional lenders should evaluate more established alternatives. For small off-grid or residential applications where Australian manufacturing origin is a priority, ASM remains a legitimate niche option. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/asm \| Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) company profile - ENF Solar \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/twinsel-electronic-technology \| Twinsel Electronic Technology company profile - ENF Solar \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/61127 \| Twinsel TSM132-8-675-700BHDG high-wattage module datasheet \| review Sources: \- \[Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/asm) \- \[Twinsel Electronic Technology - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/twinsel-electronic-technology) \- \[Twinsel TSM132-8-675-700BHDG Datasheet - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/61127) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Twinsel Electronic Technology](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-twinsel) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Twinsel Electronic Technology](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-twinsel) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Twinsel Electronic Technology](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-twinsel) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-twinsel Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.