---
title: "ASM vs Solarspace - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare ASM vs Solarspace solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarspace"
---

# ASM vs Solarspace

Solarspace has the broader catalog (82 vs 1 models). Solarspace leads on peak efficiency at 23.16%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | ASM | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Australia | China |
| Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Xuzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Employees | 1-10 | 6000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 60+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [https://solarspace.com](https://solarspace.com) |

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | ASM | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 82 | +81 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 710 W | +540 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 539 W | +369 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | ASM | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.16% | +7.16 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.04% | +6.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | ASM | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.299%/°C | +0.139 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 76 (93%) | +93 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.6 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarspace skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | ASM | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 0 | 7 (8.5%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 26 (31.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 46 (56.1%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 3 (3.7%) |


## Power distribution

Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)


| Power band | ASM | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 35 (42.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 19 (23.2%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 24 (29.3%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 3 (3.7%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (70%)


| Technology | ASM | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 57 (69.5%) |
| PERC | 0 | 18 (22.0%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 7 (8.5%) |


## Top panels, ASM


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarspace


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SS9-66HD-710N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-710n) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SS9-66HD-705N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-705n) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SS9-66HD-700N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-700n) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SS9-66HD-695N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-695n) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SS9-66HD-690N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-690n) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SS9-66HD-685N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-685n) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SS9-66HD-680N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-680n) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SS9-66HD-675N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-675n) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SS9-66HD-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SS9-66HD-670N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670n) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

ASM is a brand name for which my targeted web searches returned no usable results as an active solar panel manufacturer. The name appears in industry records primarily as a subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology that supplied cell metallization equipment rather than finished modules, and separately as an unrelated Australian commercial installer. Without verified public data on ASM's headquarters, founding date, production scale, or certification status, any characterization of the brand as a module supplier would be speculative rather than factual.

Solarspace, by contrast, is a well-documented Chinese manufacturer founded in 2011, with production facilities spanning China, Cambodia, and Laos. BloombergNEF has repeatedly recognized Solarspace on its Tier 1 bankability list, confirming the company's demonstrated ability to supply projects financed by independent commercial banks. PV InfoLink ranked Solarspace second globally in solar cell shipments in the first half of 2025, and by the end of 2023 the company had expanded cell production capacity to roughly 60 GW and module output capacity to around 7.2 GW. That scale and bankability standing give Solarspace a substantial institutional footprint relative to most mid-tier peers.

Solarspace's product portfolio spans multiple segments and cell technologies. The Lumina I series uses PERC technology for cost-conscious commercial and residential buyers, while the company's TOPCon modules reach top efficiencies confirmed above 22 percent. At RE+ 2025 Solarspace also unveiled HJT panels under its Lumina II line, targeting customers who want premium performance. For a buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025, Solarspace is the verifiable choice - it carries confirmed Tier 1 status, a documented global production footprint, and a broadening technology portfolio. ASM, as currently resolvable through public research, cannot be recommended as a panel supplier until its identity in that role is independently confirmed.

\---LINKS---

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/solarspace-solar-panels-review-in-depth-look-a1-solarstore.html \| SolarSpace solar panels in-depth review 2026 - A1 SolarStore \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/breaking-through-challenges-in-the-north-american-market-solarspace-showcases-diverse-solutions-at-re-2025/ \| SolarSpace showcases HJT and Lumina II at RE+ 2025 - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://a1solarstore.com/solar-panels/tier1.html \| Best Tier 1 Solar Panels 2026: Complete Manufacturer List - A1 SolarStore \| article

Sources:

\- \[SolarSpace solar panels review 2026: In-depth look - A1 SolarStore\](https://a1solarstore.com/blog/solarspace-solar-panels-review-in-depth-look-a1-solarstore.html)

\- \[Breaking Through Challenges in the North American Market: SolarSpace Showcases Diverse Solutions at RE+ 2025 - pv magazine International\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/breaking-through-challenges-in-the-north-american-market-solarspace-showcases-diverse-solutions-at-re-2025/)

\- \[Best Tier 1 Solar Panels 2026: Complete Manufacturer List - A1 SolarStore\](https://a1solarstore.com/solar-panels/tier1.html)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarspace)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarspace)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solarspace)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarspace

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

