--- title: "ASM vs Solarever - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ASM vs Solarever solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarever" --- # ASM vs Solarever Solarever has the broader catalog (12 vs 1 models). Solarever leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. Solarever leans bifacial (100% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | ASM | Solarever | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Australia | Mexico | | Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Colima | | Founded | 2009 | 2012 | | Employees | 1-10 | | | Annual capacity | | 1-2 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [https://www.solarever.com.mx](https://www.solarever.com.mx) | Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting... Solarever is a Mexican solar panel manufacturer, recognized as the number one national solar brand in Mexico, with a main production facility in the state of Colima. The company produces monocrystalline half-cut mono PERC solar panels and expanded into the US market in 2015-2016 through Solarever USA, with offices in... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ASM | Solarever | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 1 | 12 | +11 | | Max Power | 170 W | 630 W | +460 W | | Avg Power | 170 W | 550 W | +380 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ASM | Solarever | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.52% | +7.52 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.88% | +6.88 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ASM | Solarever | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.144 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 12 (100%) | +100 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Solarever skews to higher efficiency: 42% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | ASM | Solarever | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 0 | 7 (58.3%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 5 (41.7%) | ## Power distribution Solarever offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup) | Power band | ASM | Solarever | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 0 | 5 (41.7%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 7 (58.3%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%) | Technology | ASM | Solarever | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 0 | 12 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, ASM | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Solarever | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) | 620 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE-182\*105-615M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-615m-132-bd) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE-182\*105-610M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-610m-132-bd) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SE-182\*105-605M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-605m-132-bd) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SE-182\*105-600M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-600m-132-bd) | 600 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) | 470 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary I now have sufficient sourced information on both brands. ASM is a small panel assembler operating under the Australian Solar Manufacturing name, founded in 2009 and headquartered in Victoria, Australia. It assembles monocrystalline modules domestically using imported cells and components sourced from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China, rather than manufacturing photovoltaic cells itself. ASM does not currently hold BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status, and its publicly documented catalog is dated, with modules sitting in the 170-200 Wp range that has largely been superseded elsewhere in the industry. Solarever, by contrast, is part of Solarever Group, an American holding company founded in 2012 that began US operations in 2016 from its headquarters in Lake Forest, California, with modules manufactured in Tecoman, Mexico and assembled in the US at a current production volume of roughly 1.1 GW per year. Solarever is not yet BNEF Tier 1 rated either, but the company has stated it is actively pursuing that certification, and its production scale and organized North American supply chain give it a considerably stronger and more current institutional footprint than ASM. Solarever's lineup is built around half-cut monocrystalline PERC cells with multibusbar designs, spanning residential modules around 400-410 W alongside commercial options such as a 450 W bifacial panel and a 555 W large-format panel for utility and commercial rooftop use; PERC modules carry a 25-year warranty, with newer N-type products carrying 30 years. ASM's assembled modules are positioned mainly for general residential installations in the Australian market, with wattages well below the 400-500 W range that now dominates new installations worldwide, suggesting a catalog aimed at replacement or niche domestic jobs rather than large-scale deployment. For a typical buyer in 2025, Solarever is the more credible default: it has a documented, scaled manufacturing and assembly base, a current product range aligned with modern wattage and efficiency standards, and a clear pathway toward Tier 1 bankability. ASM may still suit small-scale, locally assembled residential projects in Australia where imported-component assembly and local support are valued over sheer production scale, but it is not a strong fit for larger or bankability-sensitive installations. \---LINKS--- \- https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-suniva \| ASM vs Suniva brand comparison and specs \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/solarever-expert-review \| 2025 Expert Review of Solarever USA Solar Panels \| review \- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/solarever-solar-panels-review-hola-from-mexico.html \| Solarever solar panels review - manufacturing in Mexico \| article \- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-solar-panel-manufacturers-list-q4-2025/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List - Q4 2025 \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarever) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarever) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solarever) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-solarever Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.