---
title: "ASM vs Sharp - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare ASM vs Sharp solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sharp"
---

# ASM vs Sharp

Sharp has the broader catalog (19 vs 1 models). Sharp leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. Sharp leans bifacial (53% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | ASM | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Australia | Japan |
| Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture |
| Founded | 2009 | 1912 |
| Employees | 1-10 | 40,123 |
| Annual capacity |  | 15.4 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | TYO: 6753 |
| Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) |

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | ASM | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 19 | +18 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 740 W | +570 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 576 W | +406 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | ASM | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.82% | +7.82 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.20% | +6.20 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | ASM | Sharp | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.138 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 10 (53%) | +53 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.6 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | ASM | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 0 | 1 (5.3%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 5 (26.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 6 (31.6%) |


## Power distribution

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | ASM | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 6 (31.6%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 6 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%)


| Technology | ASM | Sharp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (36.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 5 (26.3%) |


## Top panels, ASM


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sharp


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

ASM, traded as Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, is a small domestic assembler headquartered in Australia that positions itself as the country's only locally assembled panel maker. The company sources cells and components from international suppliers and targets the Australian residential and light-commercial market; it does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list, and its production scale remains niche by global standards. Sharp, by contrast, is a Japanese multinational founded in 1912 that began solar cell research in 1959 and moved to mass production in 1963, giving it one of the longest continuous track records in photovoltaics. Sharp carries Tier 1 bankability recognition and has the institutional depth of a large, diversified electronics group with a global distribution footprint. On the measure of scale and lender confidence, Sharp holds a substantially stronger position.

The two companies serve clearly different segments. ASM's catalog has historically centered on compact monocrystalline modules suited to Australian suburban rooftops, with older power classes well below the modern 400-plus-watt standard; it is a reasonable option for buyers who explicitly prioritize local assembly and local after-sales support. Sharp, meanwhile, offers a broad portfolio spanning residential to large commercial and utility applications, with module power outputs running from roughly 410 W to 740 W. Search results confirm that Sharp's current lineup draws on TOPCon, HJT, and PERC cell technologies, and a 610 W TOPCon module unveiled in 2024 achieved a confirmed efficiency of 22.58 percent - competitive with the wider market's premium tier.

For most buyers in 2025, Sharp is the more defensible default choice: it combines a multi-decade reliability record, Tier 1 bankability, modern high-efficiency cell technologies, and a product range that scales from a small rooftop to a ground-mounted commercial array. ASM may appeal to Australian customers with a strong preference for domestically assembled products or those requiring local warranty service without import complexity, but it cannot match Sharp's breadth, technology maturity, or financial backing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/09/24/sharp-unveils-610-w-topcon-solar-panel-with-22-58-efficiency/ \| Sharp unveils 610 W TOPCon solar panel with 22.58% efficiency \| article

\- https://cgi.sharp-world.com/solar/en/history/index.html \| Over 50 Years of History - Sharp Solar Global \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels \| Sharp Solar Panels - How They Compare To Other Top Brands \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/ \| Sharp Solar - Profile and Reviews 2026 \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/asm \| Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd - ENF Solar profile \| article

Sources:

\- \[Sharp unveils 610 W TOPCon solar panel with 22.58% efficiency\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/09/24/sharp-unveils-610-w-topcon-solar-panel-with-22-58-efficiency/)

\- \[Over 50 Years of History - Sharp Solar Global Website\](https://cgi.sharp-world.com/solar/en/history/index.html)

\- \[Sharp Solar Panels: How They Compare To Other Top Brands\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels)

\- \[Sharp Solar - Profile and Reviews - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/)

\- \[Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/asm)

\- \[Sharp Solar Panels Review - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/sharp)

\- \[ASM vs Philadelphia Solar - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-philadelphia-solar)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sharp)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sharp)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sharp](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sharp)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-sharp

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.