---
title: "ASM vs Renewsys - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare ASM vs Renewsys solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-renewsys"
---

# ASM vs Renewsys

Renewsys has the broader catalog (45 vs 1 models). Renewsys leads on peak efficiency at 23.64%. Renewsys leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | ASM | Renewsys |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Australia | India |
| Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Mumbai |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Employees | 1-10 | 1,071 |
| Annual capacity |  | 2.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [http://www.renewsysworld.com](http://www.renewsysworld.com) |

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

RenewSys is the first integrated manufacturer of Solar PV Modules and its key components - Encapsulants, Backsheets, and Solar PV Cells. Established in 2012, RenewSys is the renewable energy arm of the ENPEE Group, a diversified global conglomerate. They have manufacturing facilities in Hyderabad and Bengaluru.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | ASM | Renewsys | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 45 | +44 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 650 W | +480 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 542 W | +372 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | ASM | Renewsys | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.64% | +7.64 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.57% | +6.57 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | ASM | Renewsys | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.144 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 45 (100%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Renewsys skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | ASM | Renewsys |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 0 | 8 (17.8%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 26 (57.8%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 11 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

Renewsys offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | ASM | Renewsys |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 0 | 17 (37.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 12 (26.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 16 (35.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | ASM | Renewsys |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 45 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, ASM


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Renewsys


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-650) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-645](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-635) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-635) | 635 | 22.8 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-630) | 630 | 23.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-625) | 625 | 22.4 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 625](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-625) | 625 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-620) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Renewsys](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-renewsys)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Renewsys](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-renewsys)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Renewsys](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-renewsys)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-renewsys

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.