--- title: "ASM vs Motech - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ASM vs Motech solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-motech" --- # ASM vs Motech Motech has the broader catalog (28 vs 1 models). Motech leads on peak efficiency at 22.90%. Motech leans bifacial (11% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | ASM | Motech | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Australia | Taiwan | | Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Tainan City | | Founded | 2009 | 1981 | | Employees | 1-10 | 2,340 | | Annual capacity | | 1.2+ GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | Taipei Exchange (TPEX): 6244 | | Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [http://www.motechsolar.com](http://www.motechsolar.com) | Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting... Motech Industries Inc. is dedicated to the research, development, and manufacture of high-quality solar products and services, ranging from photovoltaic (PV) cells, PV modules, to PV power systems. The company has evolved from a test and measurement instruments designer and manufacturer to a full-service global solar... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ASM | Motech | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 1 | 28 | +27 | | Max Power | 170 W | 590 W | +420 W | | Avg Power | 170 W | 421 W | +251 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ASM | Motech | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.90% | +6.90 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 20.10% | +4.10 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ASM | Motech | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.360%/°C | +0.078 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (11%) | +11 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 25.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | ASM | Motech | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 12 (42.9%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 7 (25.0%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 3 (10.7%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 6 (21.4%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | ASM | Motech | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 13 (46.4%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 9 (32.1%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 6 (21.4%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (11%) | Technology | ASM | Motech | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 22 (78.6%) | | N-type | 0 | 3 (10.7%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 3 (10.7%) | ## Top panels, ASM | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Motech | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [XN72KF-590](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn72kf-590) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [XN72KF-585](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn72kf-585) | 585 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [XN72KF-580](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn72kf-580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [XS72CF-550](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs72cf-550) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [XS72CF-545](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs72cf-545) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [XS72CF-540](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs72cf-540) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [XN60KF-495](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn60kf-495) | 495 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [XN60KF-490](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn60kf-490) | 490 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [XN60KF-485](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xn60kf-485) | 485 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [XS60CF-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/motech-xs60cf-455) | 455 | 21.0 | -0.348 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary ASM is a small, exclusively Australian-owned panel assembler founded in 2009 and based in Hallam, Victoria. It does not manufacture its own photovoltaic cells, instead assembling modules domestically from imported components sourced from Germany, Japan, the United States, and China. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability listing has been confirmed for ASM, and its documented catalog remains in the older 170-200 Wp range with little visible updating in recent years, pointing to a modest, largely regional production scale rather than gigawatt-class output. Motech Industries, by contrast, is a Taiwan-headquartered company founded in 1981 that entered the solar cell business in the late 1990s and once ranked among the world's top ten solar cell producers by output; it is publicly traded and is the only Taiwan-based developer of N-type TOPCon cells, having started TOPCon production in 2020. Motech's own Tier 1 BloombergNEF status is likewise not confirmed in recent sources, but its manufacturing scale, technology development, and public listing give it a considerably stronger institutional footprint than ASM. In terms of typical product use, ASM's assembled panels are aimed mainly at small residential and light commercial rooftop installations within the Australian market, where "locally assembled" positioning matters more than cutting-edge cell technology. Motech operates more as a cell-centric technology supplier, historically producing mono- and multi-crystalline cells and later expanding into TOPCon cells, modules, inverters, and broader PV systems; its output is often integrated into other brands' modules or supplied to developers seeking non-China-origin, technically advanced cells rather than sold as a widely available branded consumer product. For a typical buyer in 2025, Motech is generally the stronger technical and industrial choice given its TOPCon cell development, decades of manufacturing experience, and public listing, though it is less accessible as an off-the-shelf branded module for homeowners. ASM suits a narrower niche: Australian buyers specifically prioritizing locally assembled panels over global scale, efficiency leadership, or Tier 1 bankability. The two brands are not close substitutes; the choice depends heavily on whether the buyer values domestic assembly and small-scale sourcing (ASM) or advanced cell technology and larger manufacturing pedigree (Motech). \---LINKS--- \- https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20221214PD204/motech.html \| Motech is only Taiwanese maker of TOPCon solar cells \| article \- https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/en/Articles/Details?Guid=c1c0ee54-d0b6-4a19-a8f3-7ab8f361de51&CatId=9&postname=Motech+Industries--Powered+by+the+Sun \| Motech Industries - Powered by the Sun \| article \- https://about.bnef.com/tier-1-reports/ \| BloombergNEF Tier 1 solar module reports \| article \- https://www.energymatters.com.au/renewable-news/australian-companies-manufacturing-solar-technology/ \| Australian Companies Manufacturing Solar Technology \| article Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Motech](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-motech) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Motech](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-motech) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Motech](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-motech) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-motech Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.