--- title: "ASM vs Kyocera - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ASM vs Kyocera solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-kyocera" --- # ASM vs Kyocera Kyocera has the broader catalog (8 vs 1 models). Kyocera leads on peak efficiency at 21.00%. ## The two companies | Attribute | ASM | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Australia | Japan | | Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Kyoto | | Founded | 2009 | 1959 | | Employees | 1-10 | 77,136 | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | | | Listed | | TYO: 6971 | | Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [https://global.kyocera.com](https://global.kyocera.com) | Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting... Kyocera Corporation is a Japanese multinational electronics and ceramics manufacturer. Founded in 1959, the company produces a diverse range of products, including industrial ceramics, solar power generating systems, telecommunications equipment, and office document imaging equipment. Kyocera is committed to... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ASM | Kyocera | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 1 | 8 | +7 | | Max Power | 170 W | 410 W | +240 W | | Avg Power | 170 W | 302 W | +132 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ASM | Kyocera | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 21.00% | +5.00 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 18.21% | +2.21 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ASM | Kyocera | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.460%/°C | +0.022 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | | | Avg Warranty | - | 25.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | ASM | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 5 (62.5%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 1 (12.5%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 2 (25.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | ASM | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 2 (25.0%) | ## Cell technology | Technology | ASM | Kyocera | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, ASM | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Kyocera | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [KT410W-108HL4](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [KT410W-108HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt410w-108hl4b) | 410 | 21.0 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [KK280P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk280p-3cd3cg) | 280 | 17.0 | - | Polycrystalline | | 4 | [KK275P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk275p-3cd3cg) | 275 | 16.7 | - | Polycrystalline | | 5 | [KU270-6MCA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mca) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 6 | [KU270-6MPA](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-ku270-6mpa) | 270 | 16.4 | -0.460 | Polycrystalline | | 7 | [KK270P-3CD3CG](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kk270p-3cd3cg) | 270 | 16.4 | - | Polycrystalline | | 8 | [KT230W-60HL4B](https://comparepv.com/panel/kyocera-kt230w-60hl4b) | 230 | 20.8 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary ASM, formally Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, was established in 2009 and is headquartered in Victoria, Australia. It operates as one of the few domestic solar panel assemblers in the country, building modules from imported components rather than fabricating photovoltaic cells in-house. ASM has not appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 bankability lists, reflecting its modest scale and regional focus. Kyocera, founded in Kyoto, Japan in 1959, was once a globally recognized pioneer in commercial solar, with manufacturing across Japan, North America, and China. The company exited the North American market in 2016, later closed its Tianjin factory, and now operates from a single production facility in Shiga Prefecture. Kyocera also does not appear on current Tier 1 lists, and its global footprint has contracted sharply. Of the two, Kyocera carries greater historical name recognition, though that legacy now reflects a very limited geographic presence. ASM targets the Australian residential and small commercial market, positioning itself as a locally assembled alternative to imported panels. Because it sources cells and components externally, the dominant cell technology in its modules was not confirmed by independent reviews at the time of writing. Kyocera's current line is narrow and oriented toward Japanese residential rooftops - the company released 410W modules suited to high-snowfall regions in early 2025. Its panels have historically operated in an efficiency range below today's mainstream offerings, requiring more roof space for equivalent output. One strength Kyocera retains is longevity data: a monitored installation recorded only 17.2% total degradation after more than 36 years of operation, a figure no comparable long-term dataset exists for ASM. Neither brand is a practical choice for buyers outside their respective home markets. Within Australia, ASM suits buyers who value locally assembled product and supply-chain traceability. Within Japan, Kyocera remains a credible residential option backed by its durability track record, though efficiency and scale lag behind global leaders. Buyers requiring Tier 1 bankability for commercial or utility-scale projects should look elsewhere from both manufacturers. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.enfsolar.com/asm \| Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) company profile - ENF Solar \| article \- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/kyocera-solar-panels \| Kyocera Solar Panels 2026 Review - EcoWatch \| review \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/are-kyocera-solar-panels-any-good \| Are Kyocera Solar Panels Any Good? - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/kyocera-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Kyocera Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage \| review \- https://solartechonline.com/blog/kyocera-solar-panels-review-guide/ \| Kyocera Solar Panels Review 2025 - SolarTechOnline \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kyocera) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kyocera) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Kyocera](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-kyocera) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-kyocera Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.