---
title: "ASM vs Kensol - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare ASM vs Kensol solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-kensol"
---

# ASM vs Kensol

Kensol has the broader catalog (21 vs 1 models). Kensol leads on peak efficiency at 23.00%. Kensol leans bifacial (81% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | ASM | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Australia | Poland |
| Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Gliwice |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| Employees | 1-10 | null |
| Annual capacity |  | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no |  |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [https://kensol.pl](https://kensol.pl) |

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Kensol is a Polish company founded in 2014 that focuses on providing innovative, ecological, and economical solutions for the renewable energy sector. They design equipment tailored to the needs of the Polish market, specializing in photovoltaic (PV) and heating (HVAC) systems. Kensol offers modern and integrated...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | ASM | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 21 | +20 |
| Max Power | 170 W | 460 W | +290 W |
| Avg Power | 170 W | 437 W | +267 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | ASM | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.00% | +7.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.04% | +6.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | ASM | Kensol | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.296%/°C | +0.142 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 17 (81%) | +81 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Kensol skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | ASM | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 0 | 2 (9.5%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 6 (28.6%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 11 (52.4%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (9.5%) |


## Power distribution


| Power band | ASM | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 1 (4.8%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 20 (95.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (29%)


| Technology | ASM | Kensol |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 8 (38.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (28.6%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 5 (23.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 2 (9.5%) |


## Top panels, ASM


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Kensol


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [MNHTR2-BI-460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [MNHTR2-BI 460](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-460-1) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [MNHTR2-BI-455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [MNHTR2-BI 455](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-455-1) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [MNHTR2-BI-450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [KS450MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks450mnhtr3-bi) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [MNHTR2-BI 450](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-450-1) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [MNHTR2-BI-445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [KS445MNHTR3-BI](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-ks445mnhtr3-bi) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [MNHTR2-BI 445](https://comparepv.com/panel/kensol-mnhtr2-bi-445-1) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I now have enough to write. Both brands are small niche producers with limited public coverage, so I will follow the qualitative guidance in the prompt.

ASM is most plausibly identified with Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd, a small domestic panel producer based in Australia that positions itself as one of the few manufacturers making photovoltaic modules on Australian soil. The company targets the local residential and light-commercial market, and its publicly available datasheets on industry directories such as ENF Solar reflect a modest, niche-scale operation. No credible source places ASM on a BloombergNEF Tier 1 list or attributes it a multi-gigawatt annual production capacity, suggesting it operates at a significantly smaller scale than mainstream Chinese or European manufacturers. Kensol, trading as Kensol Sp. z o.o., is a Polish manufacturer headquartered in Gliwice and listed on both ENF Solar and the SolarFeeds industry directory. Like ASM, Kensol does not appear on publicly available BloombergNEF Tier 1 rankings, placing both brands in the category of smaller regional producers rather than globally bankable tier-1 names. Neither company carries the institutional footprint associated with project finance-grade suppliers.

On the product side, Kensol's datasheets confirm monocrystalline PERC panels in roughly the 390-475 Wp range, with module efficiencies in the low-to-mid 21 percent band and a stated 25-year product and power warranty - specifications consistent with mainstream commercial and residential rooftop use in the European market. ASM's publicly listed panel models appear in a lower wattage range typical of an earlier product generation, and no current datasheets confirming a TOPCon or higher-efficiency line-up were found through independent sources, so technology claims beyond PERC-era monocrystalline cannot be verified here.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the practical choice between the two will depend almost entirely on geography and supply-chain access - Kensol for European projects, ASM for Australian domestic applications. Neither brand is interchangeable with a Tier 1 global supplier, and buyers requiring bankable modules for project finance should verify warranty backing and independent certification before committing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol \| Kensol Sp. z o.o. - Solar Panels Poland - ENF Solar Directory \| article

\- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/kensol/ \| KENSOL Company Overview - Production Capacity, Is it Tier 1? \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/52778 \| Kensol KS395-400M-SH Datasheet - ENF Panel Directory \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/asm \| Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd - ENF Solar Directory \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/13395 \| ASM ASM185M Solar Panel Datasheet - ENF Panel Directory \| article

Sources:

\- \[Kensol Sp. z o.o. - Solar Panels Poland - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/kensol)

\- \[KENSOL Company Overview - SolarFeeds\](https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/kensol/)

\- \[Kensol KS395-400M-SH Datasheet - ENF Panel Directory\](https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/52778)

\- \[Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/asm)

\- \[ASM ASM185M Solar Panel Datasheet - ENF Panel Directory\](https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/panel-datasheet/crystalline/13395)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-kensol)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-kensol)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Kensol](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-kensol)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-kensol

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.