--- title: "ASM vs Jinergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ASM vs Jinergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-jinergy" --- # ASM vs Jinergy Jinergy has the broader catalog (10 vs 1 models). Jinergy leads on peak efficiency at 23.27%. Jinergy leans bifacial (50% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | ASM | Jinergy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Australia | China | | Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | | | Founded | 2009 | 2014 | | Employees | 1-10 | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | [https://www.jinergy.com](https://www.jinergy.com) | Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ASM | Jinergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 1 | 10 | +9 | | Max Power | 170 W | 510 W | +340 W | | Avg Power | 170 W | 478 W | +308 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ASM | Jinergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.27% | +7.27 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 21.93% | +5.93 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ASM | Jinergy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.108 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 5 (50%) | +50 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | ASM | Jinergy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | 20-21% | 0 | 2 (20.0%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 3 (30.0%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 3 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 2 (20.0%) | ## Power distribution | Power band | ASM | Jinergy | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | 400-499W | 0 | 7 (70.0%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 3 (30.0%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (50%) | Technology | ASM | Jinergy | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 5 (50.0%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 5 (50.0%) | ## Top panels, ASM | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Jinergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [JKL132-B-510MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-510mh) | 510 | 21.5 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [JKL132-B-505MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-505mh) | 505 | 21.3 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [JKL132-B-500MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-500mh) | 500 | 21.1 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [JKL132-B-495MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-495mh) | 495 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [JKL132-B-490MH](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jkl132-b-490mh) | 490 | 20.8 | -0.360 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [JLSJG-D-465NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-465nb) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [JLSJG-D-460NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-460nb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [JLSJG-D-455NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-455nb) | 455 | 22.8 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [JLSJG-D-450NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-450nb) | 450 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [JLSJG-D-445NB](https://comparepv.com/panel/jinergy-jlsjg-d-445nb) | 445 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary ASM is a brand name for which I was unable to locate credible, independent information in any of the targeted searches. No major industry sources - including PV Tech, PV Magazine, TaiyangNews, EnergySage, or BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists - return results for a solar panel manufacturer operating under that brand. Given that constraint, the comparison below covers Jinergy in detail and describes ASM only in qualified terms, as required by the research instructions. Jinergy is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer headquartered in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, operating under the parent group Jinneng Holding. The company entered the HJT (heterojunction) module segment earlier than most Chinese peers, having launched its first commercial HJT modules around 2017. Its reported annual production capacity spans both monocrystalline PERC and HJT lines, with figures in industry listings pointing to roughly 2 GW of combined output in recent years, though the HJT share is growing. Jinergy's modules appear in the TaiyangNews Top Solar Modules listing for January 2026, ranking around 30th globally with a rated efficiency of approximately 22.85% for its JNHM144 HJT series. No confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation was surfaced in the searches consulted. ASM, by contrast, could not be verified as an established solar module brand in any public industry source; it is possible the name refers to a regional or private-label assembler, but no claims about scale, Tier 1 status, or technology can responsibly be made here. On the product side, Jinergy's catalog is clearly oriented toward performance-focused buyers. Its HJT bifacial modules - featuring low-temperature coefficients, no LID degradation, and strong low-light response - suit utility-scale ground mounts and premium commercial rooftop projects where long-term yield optimization justifies a higher upfront cost. The company also markets an all-black design variant targeting the residential rooftop segment in markets such as Japan and Australia. Because ASM's product families, cell technologies, and market positioning remain unverifiable, any buyer evaluating that brand against Jinergy should request third-party datasheet verification, PVEL test reports, and proof of bankability from the vendor directly before proceeding. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/09/19/jinergy-unveils-all-black-solar-module-series-for-rooftop-pv/ \| Jinergy unveils all-black solar module series for rooftop PV \| article \- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/jinergy-solar-panels/ \| Jinergy Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules overview \| review \- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/monthly-top-modules-update/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2026 \| TaiyangNews Top Solar Modules Listing - January 2026 \| article \- https://en.jinergy.com/site/news\_details/655 \| Jinergy 2022 review - four technology upgrades \| article Sources: \- \[Jinergy unveils all-black solar module series for rooftop PV\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/09/19/jinergy-unveils-all-black-solar-module-series-for-rooftop-pv/) \- \[Jinergy Solar Panels - HJT PV Modules overview\](https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/jinergy-solar-panels/) \- \[TaiyangNews Top Solar Modules Listing - January 2026\](https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/monthly-top-modules-update/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2026) \- \[Jinergy 2022 review - four technology upgrades\](https://en.jinergy.com/site/news\_details/655) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-jinergy) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-jinergy) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Jinergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-jinergy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-jinergy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.