--- title: "ASM vs DAH Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ASM vs DAH Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-dah-solar" --- # ASM vs DAH Solar DAH Solar has the broader catalog (363 vs 1 models). DAH Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.34%. DAH Solar leans bifacial (87% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | ASM | DAH Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Australia | China | | Headquarters | Hallam, Victoria | Hefei | | Founded | 2009 | 2009 | | Employees | 1-10 | 2000+ | | Annual capacity | | 10 GW/year | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au](https://www.australiansolarmanufacturing.com.au) | null | Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting... DAH Solar is an innovation-driven and technology-leading company specializing in PV product manufacturing. They focus on R&D, manufacturing, and sales of high-efficiency PV modules, integrated PV systems, and solar energy storage systems. DAH Solar is known for its patented Full-Screen PV Module and SolarUnit... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ASM | DAH Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 1 | 363 | +362 | | Max Power | 170 W | 725 W | +555 W | | Avg Power | 170 W | 520 W | +350 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ASM | DAH Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 16.00% | 23.34% | +7.34 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 16.00% | 22.10% | +6.10 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ASM | DAH Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.438%/°C | -0.299%/°C | +0.139 | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 316 (87%) | +87 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 29.4 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution DAH Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | ASM | DAH Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 10 (2.8%) | | 20-21% | 0 | 22 (6.1%) | | 21-22% | 0 | 86 (23.7%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 217 (59.8%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 28 (7.7%) | ## Power distribution DAH Solar offers more 600W+ panels (22% of lineup) | Power band | ASM | DAH Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 8 (2.2%) | | 400-499W | 0 | 161 (44.4%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 113 (31.1%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 71 (19.6%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 10 (2.8%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (88%) | Technology | ASM | DAH Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 0 | 319 (87.9%) | | PERC | 0 | 44 (12.1%) | ## Top panels, ASM | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [ASM170M](https://comparepv.com/panel/australian-solar-manufacturing-asm170m) | 170 | 16.0 | -0.438 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, DAH Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [DAS-DH132NC-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [DAS-DH132NC-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [DAS-DH132NC-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [DHN-66Y18/DG-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-dhn-66y18-dg-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [DAS-DH132NC-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/dah-solar-das-dh132nc-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary ASM (Australian Solar Manufacturing Pty Ltd) is a small Australian solar module brand primarily oriented toward the domestic residential and light commercial market. It does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, and independently verifiable data on its annual production volume are scarce - output is generally understood to be a fraction of the scale typical among Asia-based global suppliers. DAH Solar (Anhui Daheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd), headquartered in Hefei, China, was founded in 2009 and has grown into a mid-tier global manufacturer with a well-documented institutional profile. The company has maintained continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 status through at least Q1 and Q3 2025 - confirming its bankability for independently financed utility-scale projects - and reports production capacity of roughly 7.5 GW of cells and 10 GW of modules per year. On institutional footprint alone, DAH Solar operates in a substantially different league. ASM's product portfolio is not extensively documented in international trade press, and the brand appears to service a narrow regional audience without widely reviewed flagship series. DAH Solar, by contrast, has built a recognizable product architecture around three pillars: its globally patented Full-Screen PV Module (frameless on the front face, claimed 6-15% generation uplift over conventional framed designs, patented in more than 18 countries), the SolarUnit integrated system for residential and C&I applications, and the DHN TOPCon large-format series spanning 420 Wp to 630 Wp. The company is actively expanding in Europe, with a notable presence at Solar Energy Expo Poland in January 2025 and documented deployments across residential rooftop, commercial rooftop, and ground-mount utility segments. For most international buyers - especially those working in Europe, financing projects through commercial banks, or selecting modules for utility-scale tenders - DAH Solar is the verifiable default choice, backed by confirmed Tier 1 status, a multi-gigawatt manufacturing base, and active local support infrastructure in key markets. ASM may be a reasonable option for Australian buyers who value proximity of service, but outside that context the available evidence does not support treating the two brands as interchangeable. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs DAH Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-dah-solar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs DAH Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-dah-solar) - [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs DAH Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-dah-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-dah-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.