--- title: "ARTsolar vs Recom - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare ARTsolar vs Recom solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-recom" --- # ARTsolar vs Recom Recom has the broader catalog (61 vs 0 models). Recom leans bifacial (38% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | ARTsolar | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | South Africa | Italy | | Headquarters | Durban | Bolzano | | Founded | 2010 | 2007 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.artsolar.co.za](https://www.artsolar.co.za) | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | ARTsolar | Recom | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 0 | 61 | +61 | | Max Power | 0 W | 730 W | +730 W | | Avg Power | 0 W | 548 W | +548 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | ARTsolar | Recom | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | - | 24.30% | | | Avg Efficiency | - | 22.68% | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | ARTsolar | Recom | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.284%/°C | | | Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 23 (38%) | +38 pp | | Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs | | ## Efficiency distribution Recom skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | ARTsolar | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | 21-22% | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | | 22-23% | 0 | 36 (59.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 20 (32.8%) | ## Power distribution Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup) | Power band | ARTsolar | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 0 | 34 (55.7%) | | 500-599W | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | | 600-699W | 0 | 12 (19.7%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 10 (16.4%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%) | Technology | ARTsolar | Recom | | --- | --- | --- | | TOPCon | 0 | 51 (83.6%) | | HJT | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 5 (8.2%) | ## Top panels, Recom | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Recom is a European solar manufacturer with operational roots in both France and Italy, having taken over a former Bosch production facility in France in 2017. The company has achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - a bankability designation tied to securing financing from multiple independent lenders across qualifying utility-scale projects - and reports an annual production capacity of over 3.2 GW, with modules distributed to more than 110 countries. ARTsolar, by contrast, is a far smaller player headquartered in Pinetown, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, where it markets itself as the country's only locally owned solar panel manufacturer. ARTsolar does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 lists, and court proceedings that became public in 2024-2025 included testimony alleging that roughly 99% of the company's panels are imported from China - a material gap between its stated positioning and actual assembly activity. On institutional footprint and bankability, Recom holds the considerably stronger position. Recom's product range is confirmed by multiple independent sources to span heterojunction (HJT) cells in its Lion series, N-type TOPCon cells in its Lynx series, and a back-contact line aimed at premium residential rooftops, covering residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications globally. ARTsolar's catalog, distributed through South African channels, consists primarily of monocrystalline panels oriented toward residential and light commercial rooftop installations in the southern African market. The cell technology underpinning ARTsolar's imported modules has not been independently verified in publicly available technical reviews. For buyers outside southern Africa, Recom is the practical default: it carries recognized bankability credentials, offers a confirmed mix of advanced cell technologies, and operates at a scale supporting supply continuity. ARTsolar may attract buyers in South Africa who want to support local economic participation, but the unresolved High Court dispute over the authenticity of its local manufacturing claims introduces real procurement risk - especially for government-linked or REIPPP-aligned projects. \---LINKS--- \- https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/ \| Recom achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 module maker status \| article \- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/recom/ \| Recom solar panels profile and buyer data - EnergySage \| review \- https://groundup.org.za/article/local-manufacturer-actually-imports-99-its-product-court-told/ \| ARTsolar imports 99% of panels, court told - GroundUp \| article \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/05/13/artsolar-challenges-local-content-compliance-in-south-african-solar-tenders/ \| ARTsolar challenges local content compliance in SA tenders - PV Magazine \| article \- https://oxpeckers.org/2025/11/solar-court-case/ \| Court case tackles not-so-proudly South African solar power - Oxpeckers \| article Sources: \- \[Recom achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status\](https://recom-tech.com/recom-bloomberg-tier1/) \- \[Recom solar panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/recom/) \- \[ARTsolar imports 99% of panels, court told - GroundUp\](https://groundup.org.za/article/local-manufacturer-actually-imports-99-its-product-court-told/) \- \[ARTsolar challenges local content compliance - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/05/13/artsolar-challenges-local-content-compliance-in-south-african-solar-tenders/) \- \[Court case tackles not-so-proudly South African solar power - Oxpeckers\](https://oxpeckers.org/2025/11/solar-court-case/) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [ARTsolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-recom) - [ARTsolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-recom) - [ARTsolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-akcome) - [ASM vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-recom) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-recom