---
title: "Aptos Solar vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Aptos Solar vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/aptos-solar-vs-aeet"
---

# Aptos Solar vs AEET

Aptos Solar has the broader catalog (33 vs 5 models). Aptos Solar leads on peak efficiency at 21.29%. Aptos Solar leans bifacial (52% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Aptos Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | USA |  |
| Headquarters | San Antonio, TX |  |
| Founded | 2019 |  |
| Employees | 14 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.aptossolar.com](https://www.aptossolar.com) |  |

Aptos Solar Technology is a U.S. based company that leverages global sourcing to provide innovative and affordable solar technology. They offer high-performance solar panels optimized with their patented Dual Nano Absorber (DNA) technology for residential, commercial, and utility applications. The company is committed...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Aptos Solar | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 33 | 5 | +28 |
| Max Power | 550 W | 200 W | +350 W |
| Avg Power | 432 W | 190 W | +242 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Aptos Solar | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.29% | 15.70% | +5.59 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.58% | 14.90% | +5.68 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Aptos Solar | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.334%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (52%) | 0 (0%) | +52 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | Aptos Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 5 (15.2%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 20 (60.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 8 (24.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution


| Power band | Aptos Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 6 (18.2%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 24 (72.7%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 3 (9.1%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Aptos Solar | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 33 (100.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Aptos Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DNA-144-BF10-550W-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-bf10-550w-dg) | 550 | 21.3 | -0.335 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DNA-144-BF10-545W-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-bf10-545w-dg) | 545 | 21.1 | -0.335 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DNA-144-BF10-540W-DG](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-bf10-540w-dg) | 540 | 20.9 | -0.335 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DNA-120-MF10-460W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-mf10-460w) | 460 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DNA-120-BF10-460W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-bf10-460w) | 460 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DNA-120-MF10-455W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-mf10-455w) | 455 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DNA-120-BF10-455W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-bf10-455w) | 455 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DNA-144-MF26-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-144-mf26-450w) | 450 | 20.2 | -0.380 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DNA-120-BF10-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-bf10-450w) | 450 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DNA-120-MF10-450W](https://comparepv.com/panel/aptos-solar-dna-120-mf10-450w) | 450 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Aptos Solar Technology is a US-based company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, founded in 2019 by co-founders Alex Kim and Thanh "Frank" Pham, both veterans of Mission Solar. The company designs and markets panels produced under its own brand, reporting significant capacity expansion since its early years. Critically for project finance, Aptos is not listed as a Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 manufacturer and is generally classified as Tier 2, which can complicate bankability for commercially financed installations. AEET Energy Group GmbH, by contrast, is a German firm based in Bad Gandersheim that positions itself primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale and installation partner rather than a vertically integrated manufacturer - it offers solar modules under its own name sourced from third-party production partners, giving it a markedly smaller institutional footprint than most independent module brands.

On the product side, Aptos Solar is best known for its proprietary Dual Nano Absorber (DNA) series, which uses half-cut PERC cell technology and targets the residential and light commercial rooftop segment in North America. Independent reviewers note efficiency ratings reaching into the low-to-mid 20 percent range, a 25-year product warranty, and a 30-year performance warranty with annual degradation stated at around 0.54 percent - competitive metrics for a non-Tier-1 brand and priced roughly 5-15 percent below comparable Tier 1 options. AEET Energy Group's module offering is narrower and less documented in third-party review channels; the product warranty cited on their materials runs to ten years, which is notably shorter than the current residential industry standard of 25 years, and independent performance data is scarce.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Aptos Solar represents the more substantiated choice of the two, with clearer third-party documentation, stronger warranty terms, and a dedicated residential product line. AEET Energy Group may suit buyers already working with them as an installation partner in Germany, but as a standalone panel brand it lacks the review depth and warranty parity to recommend on equal footing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/aptos-solar-panels-expert-review \| Aptos Solar panels expert review - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/aptos-solar-technology/ \| Aptos Solar Technology profile and installer reviews - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH company profile - ENF Solar \| article

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group buyer guide - EnergyPal \| review

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review Of Aptos Solar Panels\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/aptos-solar-panels-expert-review)

\- \[Aptos Solar Technology Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/aptos-solar-technology/)

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet)

\- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group)

\- \[Solar Panel Bankability and the Tier 1 List - RENVU\](https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/solar-panel-bankability-and-the-tier-1-list)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Aptos Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aptos-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [Aptos Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aptos-solar-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [Aptos Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/aptos-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/aptos-solar-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

