--- title: "AmoSolar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare AmoSolar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-trina-solar" --- # AmoSolar vs Trina Solar Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 77 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | | China | | Headquarters | | Changzhou | | Founded | | 1997 | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | no | yes | | Listed | | | | Website | | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 77 | 340 | +263 | | Max Power | 675 W | 760 W | +85 W | | Avg Power | 522 W | 520 W | +1 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 24.80% | +1.97 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.14% | 21.71% | +0.57 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.339%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.037 | | Bifacial Share | 17 (22%) | 145 (43%) | +21 pp | | Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.7 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 1 (1.3%) | 22 (6.5%) | | 20-21% | 29 (37.7%) | 57 (16.8%) | | 21-22% | 41 (53.2%) | 83 (24.4%) | | 22-23% | 6 (7.8%) | 102 (30.0%) | | 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) | ## Power distribution Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup) | Power band | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 8 (10.4%) | 28 (8.2%) | | 400-499W | 25 (32.5%) | 142 (41.8%) | | 500-599W | 26 (33.8%) | 54 (15.9%) | | 600-699W | 18 (23.4%) | 72 (21.2%) | | 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (86%) Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%) | Technology | AmoSolar | Trina Solar | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 66 (85.7%) | 75 (22.1%) | | TOPCon | 11 (14.3%) | 248 (72.9%) | | Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) | | N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) | ## Top panels, AmoSolar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [AS675G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-132) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [AS675G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-120) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [AS670G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [AS670G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-120) | 670 | 21.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [AS665G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [AS665G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-120) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [AS660G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [AS660G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-120) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [AS655G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [AS655G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-120) | 655 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Trina Solar | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary AmoSolar is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Hefei, established around 2008, which claims over 3 GW of annual module production capacity across TOPCon, HJT, and BC cell technologies. The company participates in major European industry events - Smarter E Europe 2025 in Munich being a recent example - signaling ambitions to grow internationally, but it does not appear in BloombergNEF Tier 1 rankings or in widely cited independent review platforms such as SolarReviews or Clean Energy Reviews. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu, operates at a categorically different scale: the company shipped 65.21 GW of modules in 2023 and approximately 77 GW in 2024, placing it among the world's top four module manufacturers with roughly 11% global market share. Trina Solar has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status without interruption - confirmed again in Q1 2025 - and has earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years. On institutional footprint alone, Trina Solar leads by a considerable margin. AmoSolar's portfolio addresses residential rooftop, commercial C&I, and utility-scale configurations, with its 2025 lineup spanning N-type TOPCon bifacial modules and HJT bifacial panels; however, publicly available independent field-test data and major project references are sparse. Trina Solar's Vertex series, built on N-type TOPCon cells using the company's proprietary PACO technology, serves all segments from residential through grid-scale ground-mount. The Vertex S+ targets homeowners and small commercial buyers, offering efficiencies up to 22.5% at pricing often cited below the market average, while larger Vertex formats address utility-scale procurement. Trina's flagship modules carry a 25-year product warranty and a 30-year performance warranty guaranteeing 89.4% output after 25 years - terms substantiated by PVEL third-party testing records. For most international buyers - whether a residential homeowner, a commercial integrator, or a project finance team - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default. Its verified Tier 1 bankability, decade-long PVEL track record, high shipment volumes, and transparently documented warranty terms meet the bar that lenders and insurers routinely require. AmoSolar may appeal to cost-sensitive buyers prepared to conduct deeper due diligence on a smaller, less independently verified brand, or to projects where formal Tier 1 bankability is not a financing prerequisite; for all other buyers, the two brands are not interchangeable. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [AmoSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar) - [AmoSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar) - [AmoSolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-trina-solar Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.