---
title: "AmoSolar vs Q-Cells - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AmoSolar vs Q-Cells solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-q-cells"
---

# AmoSolar vs Q-Cells

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 77 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AmoSolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seoul |
| Founded |  | 1999 |
| Employees |  | 2000+ |
| Annual capacity |  | 11.2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: HQCL |
| Website |  | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AmoSolar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 77 | 89 | +12 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 675 W |  |
| Avg Power | 522 W | 468 W | +53 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AmoSolar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 23.20% | +0.37 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.14% | 21.21% | +0.07 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AmoSolar | Q-Cells | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.339%/°C | -0.325%/°C | +0.014 |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (22%) | 35 (39%) | +17 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 27.0 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AmoSolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (1.3%) | 7 (7.9%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (37.7%) | 29 (32.6%) |
| 21-22% | 41 (53.2%) | 30 (33.7%) |
| 22-23% | 6 (7.8%) | 21 (23.6%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |


## Power distribution

AmoSolar offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)


| Power band | AmoSolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (10.4%) | 20 (22.5%) |
| 400-499W | 25 (32.5%) | 41 (46.1%) |
| 500-599W | 26 (33.8%) | 11 (12.4%) |
| 600-699W | 18 (23.4%) | 17 (19.1%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (86%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | AmoSolar | Q-Cells |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 66 (85.7%) | 38 (42.7%) |
| TOPCon | 11 (14.3%) | 8 (9.0%) |
| N-type | 0 | 23 (25.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 (22.5%) |


## Top panels, AmoSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS675G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-132) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS675G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-120) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS670G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS670G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-120) | 670 | 21.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS665G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS665G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-120) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS660G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS660G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-120) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS655G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS655G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-120) | 655 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AmoSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-q-cells)
- [AmoSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-q-cells)
- [AmoSolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-q-cells)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-q-cells

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.