---
title: "AmoSolar vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AmoSolar vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-hyundai"
---

# AmoSolar vs Hyundai

AmoSolar has the broader catalog (77 vs 65 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AmoSolar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | South Korea |
| Headquarters |  | Seongnam-si |
| Founded |  | 2004 |
| Employees |  | 206 |
| Annual capacity |  | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website |  | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AmoSolar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 77 | 65 | +12 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 640 W | +35 W |
| Avg Power | 522 W | 442 W | +79 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AmoSolar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 23.40% | +0.57 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.14% | 21.49% | +0.35 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AmoSolar | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.339%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (22%) | 43 (66%) | +44 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AmoSolar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (1.3%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (37.7%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 41 (53.2%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 6 (7.8%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

AmoSolar offers more 600W+ panels (23% of lineup)


| Power band | AmoSolar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (10.4%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 25 (32.5%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 26 (33.8%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 18 (23.4%) | 3 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (86%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | AmoSolar | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 66 (85.7%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| TOPCon | 11 (14.3%) | 6 (9.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 9 (13.8%) |


## Top panels, AmoSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS675G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-132) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS675G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-120) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS670G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS670G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-120) | 670 | 21.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS665G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS665G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-120) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS660G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS660G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-120) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS655G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS655G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-120) | 655 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [AmoSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [AmoSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [AmoSolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.