---
title: "AmoSolar vs Canadian Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare AmoSolar vs Canadian Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-canadian-solar"
---

# AmoSolar vs Canadian Solar

Canadian Solar has the broader catalog (292 vs 77 models). Canadian Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.40%. Canadian Solar leans bifacial (46% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | Canada |
| Headquarters |  | Kitchener |
| Founded |  | 2001 |
| Employees |  | 17,113 |
| Annual capacity |  | 51 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NASDAQ: CSIQ |
| Website |  | [https://www.canadiansolar.com](https://www.canadiansolar.com) |

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company founded in 2001. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, it manufactures solar PV modules and provides battery energy storage solutions. The company also develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 77 | 292 | +215 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 730 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 522 W | 472 W | +50 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.83% | 24.40% | +1.57 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.14% | 20.66% | +0.48 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.339%/°C | -0.331%/°C | +0.007 |
| Bifacial Share | 17 (22%) | 133 (46%) | +23 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 26.5 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Canadian Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (1.3%) | 128 (43.8%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (37.7%) | 36 (12.3%) |
| 21-22% | 41 (53.2%) | 41 (14.0%) |
| 22-23% | 6 (7.8%) | 50 (17.1%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 37 (12.7%) |


## Power distribution

Canadian Solar offers more 600W+ panels (24% of lineup)


| Power band | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 8 (10.4%) | 104 (35.6%) |
| 400-499W | 25 (32.5%) | 72 (24.7%) |
| 500-599W | 26 (33.8%) | 45 (15.4%) |
| 600-699W | 18 (23.4%) | 64 (21.9%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 7 (2.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (86%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (67%)


| Technology | AmoSolar | Canadian Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 66 (85.7%) | 195 (66.8%) |
| TOPCon | 11 (14.3%) | 85 (29.1%) |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (4.1%) |


## Top panels, AmoSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AS675G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-132) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AS675G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as675g12-120) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AS670G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-132) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AS670G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as670g12-120) | 670 | 21.5 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AS665G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-132) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AS665G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as665g12-120) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AS660G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-132) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AS660G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as660g12-120) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AS655G12-132](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-132) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AS655G12-120](https://comparepv.com/panel/amosolar-as655g12-120) | 655 | 21.0 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Canadian Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CS7N-730TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-730tb-ag) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CS7N-725TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-725tb-ag) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CS7N-720TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-720tb-ag) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CS7N-715TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-715tb-ag) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CS7N-710TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-710tb-ag) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CS7N-705TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-705tb-ag) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CS7N-700TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-700tb-ag) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CS7N-695TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-695tb-ag) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CS7N-690TB-AG](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-690tb-ag) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CS7N-675MS](https://comparepv.com/panel/csi-solar-co-ltd-canadian-solar-cs7n-675ms) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AmoSolar is a Chinese manufacturer based in Hefei, Anhui province, with more than 15 years in the industry, positioning itself as a one-stop solar provider offering modules, lithium-ion and sodium-ion energy storage, and complete on-grid, off-grid and hybrid systems. The company cites roughly 3 GW of annual production capacity and holds certifications including ISO, IEC, CE, TUV and regional approvals such as INMETRO and SONCAP, but it does not currently appear on the publicly tracked BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, which limits its bankability for large debt-financed projects. Canadian Solar, founded in 2001 and listed on Nasdaq, is a long-established global player with roughly 61 GW of annual module manufacturing capacity and a consistent multi-year presence on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list, giving it a substantially stronger institutional track record and lender acceptance.

Both brands now center their lineups on TOPCon cell technology, with AmoSolar also developing HJT and back-contact (BC) products, while Canadian Solar offers a mature product family - TOPHiKu, BiHiKu and TOPBiHiKu - spanning residential, commercial and utility-scale ground-mount applications. AmoSolar tends to target smaller residential and commercial prosumer installations and emerging markets, often bundling modules with storage, whereas Canadian Solar has a long history supplying utility-scale solar farms and C&I projects across Europe, North America and Asia.

For a buyer prioritizing bankability, financing ease and a long verifiable delivery record, Canadian Solar is the safer default choice. AmoSolar can be a reasonable option for smaller, privately financed installations where price and product flexibility matter more than formal Tier 1 status.

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [AmoSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-canadian-solar)
- [AmoSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-canadian-solar)
- [AmoSolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-canadian-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/amosolar-vs-canadian-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.